Citation:
Yanxin Feng,Ould el Moctar,Thomas E. Schellin.Parametric Hull Form Optimization of Containerships for Minimum Resistance in Calm Water and in Waves[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2021,(4):670-693.[doi:10.1007/s11804-021-00243-w]
Click and Copy
Parametric Hull Form Optimization of Containerships for Minimum Resistance in Calm Water and in Waves
Yanxin Feng,Ould el Moctar,Thomas E. Schellin.Parametric Hull Form Optimization of Containerships for Minimum Resistance in Calm Water and in Waves[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2021,(4):670-693.[doi:10.1007/s11804-021-00243-w]
Info
- Title:
- Parametric Hull Form Optimization of Containerships for Minimum Resistance in Calm Water and in Waves
- Author(s):
- Yanxin Feng; Ould el Moctar; Thomas E. Schellin
- Affilations:
- Keywords:
- Parametric hull|Optimization|Wave added resistance|DAKOTA|Surrogate-based global optimization
- DOI:
- 10.1007/s11804-021-00243-w
- Abstract:
- This paper described the process of generating the optimal parametric hull shape with a fully parametric modeling method for three containerships of different sizes. The newly created parametric ship hull was applied to another ship with a similar shape, which greatly saved time cost. A process of selecting design variables was developed, and during this process, the influence of these variables on calm water resistance was analyzed. After we obtained the optimal hulls, the wave added resistance and motions of original hulls and optimal hulls in regular head waves were analyzed and compared with experimental results. Computations of the flow around the hulls were obtained from a validated nonlinear potential flow boundary element method. Using the multi-objective optimization algorithm, surrogate-based global optimization (SBGO) reduced the computational effort. Compared with the original hull, wave resistance of the optimal hulls was significantly reduced for the two larger ships at Froude numbers corresponding to their design speeds. Optimizing the hull of the containerships slightly reduced their wave added resistance and total resistance in regular head waves, while optimization of their hulls hardly affected wave-induced motions.
References:
Adams, Brian, Bohnhoff, William, Dalbey, Keith, Ebeida, Mohamed, Eddy, John, Eldred, Michael, Hooper, Russell, Hough, Patricia, Hu, Kenneth, Jakeman, John, Khalil, Mohammad, Maupin, Kathryn, Monschke, Jason A., Ridgway, Elliott, Rushdi, Ahmad, Seidl, Daniel, Stephens, John, and Winokur, Justin. Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.13 User’s Manual. United States: N. p., 2020. https://doi.org/10.2172/1817318
Brizzolara S, Vernengo G, Pasquinucci C, Haries S (2015). Significance of parametric hull form definition on hydrodynamic performance optimization. A: MARINE VI: proceedings of the VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering. CIMNE, 2015, p. 254–265. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2117/332280. Accessed 16 Dec 2021
Chen J, Yu C, Chen L (2019) Study of trim optimization based on design of experiments and RANS simulation. 11th International Workshop on Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics, Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3357
DNVGL (2015) Rules for Classification of Ships. Part 3 Hull, Chapter 14 Rudders and Steering, 1-48. Edition October 2015, amended January 2017. https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/ru-ship/2017-01/DNVGL-RU-SHIP-Pt3Ch14.pdf
Dogrul A, Song S, Demirel YK (2020) Scale effect on ship resistance components and form factor. Ocean Eng 209:107428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107428
El Moctar O, Schigunov V, Zorn T (2012) Duisburg test case: Post-panamax container ship for benchmarking. Ship Technol Res 59(3):50–64. https://doi.org/10.1179/str.2012.59.3.004
El Moctar O, Sigmund S, Lay J, Schellin TE (2017) Numerical and experimental analysis of added resistance of ships in waves. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 139(1):011301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034205
Feng Y, El Moctar O, Schellin TE (2020a) Hydrodynamic optimisation of a multi-purpose wind offshore supply vessel. Ship Technol Res 67(2):69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2019.1602976
Feng Y, El Moctar O, Schellin TE (2020b) Hydrodynamic optimization of a containership. Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 84331:V02BT02A017. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2020-18616
Fonseca N, Guedes Soares C (2004) Experimental investigation of the nonlinear effects on the vertical motions and loads of a containership in regular waves. J Ship Res 48(2):118–147. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2004.48.2.148
Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1-3):50–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001
Fujii H (1975) Experimental study on the resistance increase of a ship in regular oblique waves. Proceeding of the 14th ITTC, Ottawa, pp 351–360
Gaggero ST, Villa D, Viviani M (2015) The Kriso container ship (KCS) test case: an open source overview. In: VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering. MARINE, Rome, pp 735–749
Hachmann D (1991) Calculation of pressures on a ship’s hull in waves. Ship Techonol Res 38:111–133
Harries S (1998). Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. PhD thesis, Institut fur Schiffs-und Meerestechnik, Technische Universitat Berlin, Berlin.
Harries S, Abt C (1998) Parametric curve design applying fairness criteria. In: International workshop, Creating fair and shape-preserving curves and surfaces. Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 67–78
Heinrich S (2009) A 3-D Rankine source seakeeping method. Ship Technol Res 56(2):50–68. https://doi.org/10.1179/str.2009.56.2.002
Heinrich S, Schigunov V, Schellin TE, El Moctar O (2012) Rankine source method for seakeeping predictions. Am Soc Mech Eng 44915:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83450
Heinrich S, Schigunov V, Schellin TE, El Moctar O (2014) A Rankine panel method for added resistance of ships in waves. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 136(3):031601. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026847
Hughes G (1954) Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. In: Institution of Naval Architects. RINA Transactions, London, pp 1954–1916
ISMT (2012) Retrieved from Institute of Ship Technology, Ocean Engineering Transport Systems, University Duisburg-Essen. http://www.uni-due.de/ISMT/. Accessed 16 Dec 2021
ITTC (2002a) Report of the specialist Committee of Extreme Ship Motions and Capsizing. 23rd International Towing Tank Conference, Venice
ITTC (2002b). Testing and extrapolation methods, resistance test. ITTC-Recommanded Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-02.02.01, 23rd ITTC.
Kim W, Van S, Kim D (2001) Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp Fluids 31(5):567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480100332
Kim M, Hizir O, Turan O, Day S, Incecik A (2017) Estimation of added resistance and ship speed loss in a seaway. Ocean Eng 141:465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.051
Kracht A (1978) Design of bulbous bows. SNAME Trans 86(1):197–217
Kracht A, Jacobsen A (1992) D-series systematic experiments with models of fast twin-screw displacement ships. Soc Naval Architects Mar Eng 100:199–222
Kume KI (2000) Measurements of surface pressure and local velocity field around a KCS model and uncertainty analysis. Proceedings, Gothenburg 2000 - Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg
Larsson L, Stern F, Betram V (2003) Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 Workshop. J Ship Res 47(1):63–81. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2003.47.1.63
MOERI (2008). MOERI Container Ship (KCS). Retrieved from http://www.simman2008.dk/KCS/container.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2021
Nakamura S, Naito S (1977) Propulsive performance of a container ship in waves. J Soc Naval Architects Jpn 15:24–48
Nowacki H (1977) Ship lines creation by computer-objectives, methods, and results. Symposium on Computer-Aided Hull Surface Definition. Retrieved from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10030565389/en/. Accessed 16 Dec 2021.
Papanikolaou A, Liu S (2010) On the prediction of added resistance of ships in waves. William Froude Conf: Adv Theor Appl Hydrodyn–Past, Future. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.12.007
Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001
Riesner M, El Moctar O (2018) A time domain boundary element method for wave added resistance of ships taking into account viscous effects. Ocean Eng 162:290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.010
Riesner M, El Moctar O, Schellin TE (2018) Design related speed loss and fuel consumption of ships in seaways. Progress in Maritime Technology and Engineering: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering, Lisbon. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429505294-18
Riesner M, Chillcce G, El Moctar O (2019) Rankine source time domain method for nonlinear ship motions in steep oblique waves. Ships Offshore Struct 14(3):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2018.1498568
Rotteveel E, van der Ploeg A, Hekkenberg R (2016) Optimization of ships in shallow water with viscous flow computa-tions and surrogate modeling. 13th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, Copenhagen
Sadat-Hosseini H, Toxopeus S, Kim DH, Catiglione T, Sanada Y, Stocker M, Simonsen C, Otzen JF, Toda Y, Stern F (2015) Experiments and computations for KCS added resistance for variable heading. Procceding of the 5th World Maritime Technology Conference, Rhode Island
Scholcz TP, Veldhuis CH (2017) Multi-objective surrogate based hull-form optimization using high-fidelity RANS computations. MARINE, Barcelona, pp 231–242
Scholcz TP, Gornicz T, Veldhuis CH (2015) Multi-objective hull-form optimization using Kriging on noisy computer experiments. International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, Rome, pp 1064–1077
Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Joncquez S, Stern F (2013) EFD and CFD for KCS heaving and pitching in regular head waves. J Mar Sci Technol 18(4):435–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0219-0
Somayajula A, Guha A, Falzarano J, Chun HH, Jung KH (2014) Added resistance and parametric roll prediction as a design criteria for energy efficient ships. Ocean Syst Eng 4(2):117–136. https://doi.org/10.12989/OSE.2014.4.2.117
Tun TY (2016). Ship hull optimization in calm water and moderate sea states. Master thesis, Rostock.
Van S (1997) Measurement of flows around a 3600TEU container ship model. In: Proceedings, Annual Autumn Meeting. SNAK, Seoul, pp 300–304
Van S (1998a) Flow measurement around a 300K VLCC model. Proceedings of the Annual Spring Meeting, Ulsan, pp 185–188
Van S (1998b) Experimental investigation of the flow characteristics around practical hull forms. Third Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design, Osaka
Zhang ZR (2010) Verification and validation for RANS simulation of KCS container ship without/with propeller. J Hydrodyn 22(1):889–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60055-8
Memo
- Memo:
-
Received date:2021-06-29;Accepted date:2021-09-27。
Foundation item:Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study is partly supported by the University Postgraduate Program ([2013]3009) through the China Scholarship Council (CSC) [N201306250034].
Corresponding author:Yanxin Feng,E-mail:yanxin.feng@uni-due.de
