|Table of Contents|

Citation:
 Jincheng Sha,Jiancheng Leng,Houbin Mao,et al.Research Progress in Predictive Maintenance of Offshore Platform Structures Based on Digital Twin Technology[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2025,(5):877-899.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00649-w]
Click and Copy

Research Progress in Predictive Maintenance of Offshore Platform Structures Based on Digital Twin Technology

Info

Title:
Research Progress in Predictive Maintenance of Offshore Platform Structures Based on Digital Twin Technology
Author(s):
Jincheng Sha12 Jiancheng Leng1 Houbin Mao1 Jinyuan Pei1 Kaixin Diao1
Affilations:
Author(s):
Jincheng Sha12 Jiancheng Leng1 Houbin Mao1 Jinyuan Pei1 Kaixin Diao1
1. School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China;
2. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China
Keywords:
Offshore platform|Digital twin|Physical entity monitoring|Digital model construction|Predictive maintenance
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00649-w
Abstract:
Offshore platforms are large, complex structures designed for long-term service, and they are characterized by high risk and significant investment. Ensuring the safety and reliability of in-service offshore platforms requires intelligent operation and maintenance strategies. Digital twin technology can enable the accurate description and prediction of changes in the platform’s physical state through real-time monitoring data. This technology is expected to revolutionize the maintenance of existing offshore platform structures. A digital twin system is proposed for real-time assessment of structural health, prediction of residual life, formulation of maintenance plans, and extension of service life through predictive maintenance. The system integrates physical entities, digital models, intelligent predictive maintenance tools, a visualization platform, and interconnected modules to provide a comprehensive and efficient maintenance framework. This paper examines the current development status of core technologies in physical entity monitoring, digital model construction, and intelligent predictive maintenance. It also outlines future directions for the advancement of these technologies within the digital twin system, offering technical insights and practical references to support further research and applications of digital twin technology in offshore platform structures.

References:

[1] Abdulle A, Bai Y (2013) Adaptive reduced basis finite element heterogeneous multiscale method. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 257: 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.01.002
[2] Aeran A, Siriwardane SC, Mikkelsen O, Langen I (2017) A framework to assess structural integrity of ageing offshore jacket structures for life extension. Mar. Struct. 56: 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.08.002
[3] API Recommended Practice (RP) (2014) Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design, API RP 2A-WSD
[4] Arif M, Khan F, Ahmed S, Imtiaz S (2022) A generalized framework for risk-based extreme load analysis in offshore system design. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 145(2): 021701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055553
[5] Arora V (2011) Comparative study of finite element model updating methods. J. Vib. Control 17: 2023-2039. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546310395967
[6] Ballani J, Huynh DP, Knezevic DJ, Nguyen L, Patera AT (2018) A component-based hybrid reduced basis/finite element method for solid mechanics with local nonlinearities. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 329: 498-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.014
[7] Berman A, Nagy EJ (1983) Improvement of a large analytical model using test data. AIAA J. 21: 1168-1173. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60140
[8] Bhat S, Nadathur V, Knezevic D, Aalberts P, Kolsters H, Amuda D, Atebe O, Pasala D, Hoang T, Luong T, Huynh P, Righetti R, Hageman R, Yu J (2021) Structural digital twin of fpso for monitoring the hull and topsides based on inspection data and load measurement. Offshore Technology Conference, Virtual and Houston, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4043/31328-MS
[9] Bhowmik S (2019) Life extension of offshore structure using machine learning. Offshore Technology Conference Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4043/29759-MS
[10] Carvalho TP, Soares FAAM, Vita R, Francisco RDP, Basto JP, Alcalá SGS (2019) A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 137: 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
[11] Cevasco D, Tautz-Weinert J, Richmond M, Sobey A, Kolios AJ (2022) A damage detection and location scheme for offshore wind turbine jacket structures based on global modal properties. ASME J Risk Uncertainty Part B 8(2): 021103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053659
[12] Chen B, Hu Y, Tan M (1990) Local joint flexibility of tubular joints of offshore structures. Mar. Struct. 3: 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8339(90)90025-M
[13] Cook HH, Dopjera DE, Thethi R, Williams L (2006) Riser integrity management for deepwater developments. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4043/17891-MS
[14] Correa OC, Mariano JS, Amaro EP, Santos EDN (2023) Process safety management in oil and gas operating units through digital twin platform: a digital approach for safety control and process intervention. Offshore Technology Conference Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4043/32894-MS
[15] Dhanak MR, Xiros NI (2016) Springer handbook of ocean engineering. Springer
[16] Dhiraj, Agarwal A, Agrawal A, Meruane V, Sangwan KS (2021) Development of a machine learning based model for damage detection, localization and quantification to extend structure life. Procedia Cirp 98: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.030
[17] Ding H, Luo J, Zhang P, Le C (2023) Lateral loading capacity of jacket foundation with three helical piles for offshore wind turbines. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 22: 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00366-2
[18] DNV GL (2016) DNVGL-RP-C203. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. DNVGL-Recommended Practice, Oslo
[19] Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review, United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/249299
[20] Dong W, Moan T, Gao Z (2011) Long-term fatigue analysis of multiplanar tubular joints for jacket-type offshore wind turbine in time domain. Eng. Struct. 33: 2002-2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.037
[21] Dubois J, Muskulus M, Schaumann P (2013) Advanced representation of tubular joints in jacket models for offshore wind turbine simulation. Energy Procedia 35: 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.176
[22] Eftang JL, Patera AT (2014) A port-reduced static condensation reduced basis element method for large component-synthesized structures: approximation and a posteriori error estimation. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 1: 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1186/2213-7467-1-3
[23] Errandonea I, Beltrán S, Arrizabalaga S (2020) Digital twin for maintenance: a literature review. Comput. Ind. 123: 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103316
[24] Farhat C, Hemez FM (1993) Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology. AIAA J. 31: 1702-1711. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11833
[25] Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media
[26] Gerner MB, Perryman SR, Geyer JF, Von Aschwege JT (2007) Marine monitoring of gulf of mexico deepwater floating systems. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4043/18626-MS
[27] Githens G (2007) Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking by michael grieves. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 24: 278-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00250_2.x
[28] Glaessgen E, Stargel D (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air force vehicles. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818
[29] Grieves M (2011) Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management. Space Coast Press Cocoa Beach
[30] Grieves M (2014) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Paper 1: 1-7
[31] Grieves MW (2005) Product lifecycle management: the new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2: 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpd.2005.006669
[32] Gulgec NS, Taká? M, Pakzad SN (2020) Structural sensing with deep learning: strain estimation from acceleration data for fatigue assessment. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35: 1349-1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12565
[33] Guyan RJ (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J. 3: 380. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2874
[34] Hansen OH, Stang J, Jaiswal V (2024) A trustworthy digital twin for data driven verification. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4043/35081-MS
[35] He K, Pan Z, Zhao W, Wang J, Wan D (2024) Overview of research progress on numerical simulation methods for turbulent flows around underwater vehicles. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 23: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-024-00403-8
[36] Hou R, Xia Y (2021) Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010-2019. J. Sound Vibr. 491: 115741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741
[37] Huang S, Liu J (2002) A novel method for reducing noises in GPS deformation monitoring system. Acta Geodaetica Et Cartographica Sinica 31: 104-107
[38] Jayanthan M, Srinivas V (2015) Structural damage identification based on finite element model updating. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation 5: 59-63. https://doi.org/10.5923/c.jmea.201502.12
[39] Kammer DC (1987) Test-analysis model development using an exact modal reduction. International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis 2: 174-179
[40] Khalifa AA, Haggag S, Fayed M (2014) Fatigue assessment analysis of offshore structures with application to an existing platform in suez gulf, egypt. World Applied Sciences Journal 30: 1000-1019
[41] Khan F, Thodi P, Imtiaz S, Abbassi R (2016a) Real-time monitoring and management of offshore process system integrity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 14: 61-71
[42] Khan R, Kraincanic I, Smith K, Gunn M (2016b) The role of local joint flexibility (LIF) in the structural assessments of ageing offshore structures. The Twelfth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium, Gold Coast, 518-524
[43] Khandelwal K (2008) Multi-scale computational simulation of progressive collapse of steel frames. University of Michigan
[44] Knezevic DJ, Kang H, Sharma P, Malinowski G, Nguyen TT (2018) Structural integrity management of offshore structures via RB-FEA and fast full load mapping based digital twins. The 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Sapporo, 1786-1792
[45] Knights A, Lemasson A, Frost M, Somerfield P (2024) The world must rethink plans for ageing oil and gas platforms. Nature 627: 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00645-0
[46] Ladevèze P, Nouy A, Loiseau O (2002) A multiscale computational approach for contact problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 191: 4869-4891. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(02)00406-1
[47] Lai X, He X, Wang S, Wang X, Sun W, Song X (2022) Building a lightweight digital twin of a crane boom for structural safety monitoring based on a multifidelity surrogate model. J. Mech. Des. 144: 64502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053606
[48] Lai X, Wang S, Guo Z, Zhang C, Sun W, Song X (2021) Designing a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on multiple models and dynamic data: a boom crane example. J. Mech. Des. 143: 71703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049861
[49] Leng J, Gardoni P, Wang M, Li Z, Królczyk G, Feng S, Incecik A, Li W (2023) Condition-based structural health monitoring of offshore wind jacket structures: opportunities, challenges, and perspectives. Structural Health Monitoring, 83948258. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217221148688
[50] Leng J, Hongxu T, Guoqiang Z, Zemin WU (2017) Survey on research on dynamic damage detection methods for in-service offshore platform. China Safety Science Journal 27: 79. https://doi.org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.09.014
[51] Leng J, Ma J, Feng H (2024) An adaptive convolutional neural network based on transmissibility grayscale image for online identification of offshore platform damage pattern. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 221: 111713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111713
[52] Leng J, Tian H, Xu S, Zhou G, Zhao H (2019) Platform structure dynamics model revision based on optimized kriging model. Journal of Vibration and Shock 38(18): 18-23. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.18.003
[53] Leser PE, Hochhalter JD, Warner JE, Newman JA, Leser WP, Wawrzynek PA, Yuan F (2017) Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using surrogate models trained via three-dimensional finite element analysis. Structural Health Monitoring 16: 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716643298
[54] Li C, Mahadevan S, Ling Y, Choze S, Wang L (2017) Dynamic bayesian network for aircraft wing health monitoring digital twin. AIAA J. 55: 930-941. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055201
[55] Li D, Lyu BC, Wu WH, Li H (2022) Status and prospect of offshore platform on-site monitoring technology. China Offshore Oil Gas 34: 165-179
[56] Li Y, Li H, Sau-Lon S, Hu J, Chen X, Gao Z (2011) Boundary updating of offshore jacket structures based on measured modal frequencies. The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Maui, 219-225
[57] Li ZG, Li YC, Wang SQ, Yang B (2012) Finite element model updating of a steel jacket scale model. Applied Mechanics and Materials 166: 588-592. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.166-169.588
[58] Li ZX, Chan T, Yu Y, Sun ZH (2009) Concurrent multi-scale modeling of civil infrastructures for analyses on structural deterioration—part I: modeling methodology and strategy. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 45: 782-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.013
[59] Liu J, Geng T, Wang X, Qin G (2020) Determinants of oil footprints embodied in sino-us trade: a perspective from the globalizing world. Energies 13: 3786. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153786
[60] Liu M, Wu W, Tang D, Ma H, Naess A (2018) Current profile analysis and extreme value prediction in the lh11-1 oil field of the south china sea based on prototype monitoring. Ocean Eng. 153: 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.064
[61] Ma Y, Tai B, Xie B, Xu T, Perlin M, Dong G (2023) Progress in the research of wave slamming forces on vertical cylinders. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 22: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00313-1
[62] Mai QA, Sørensen JD, Rigo P (2016) Updating failure probability of a welded joint in offshore wind turbine substructures. ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-54232
[63] Michopoulos JG, Farhat C, Fish J (2005) Modeling and simulation of multiphysics systems. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 5: 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2031269
[64] Morgan MR, Lee M (1998) Stress concentration factors in tubular k-joints under in-plane moment loading. J. Struct. Eng. 124: 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(382)
[65] Morison JR, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology 2: 149-154. https://doi.org/10.2118/950149-G
[66] Nabuco B, Tarpø M, Tygesen UT, Brincker R (2020) Fatigue stress estimation of an offshore jacket structure based on operational modal analysis. Shock Vib. 2020: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7890247
[67] O’Callahan J (1989) A procedure for an improved reduced system (IRS) model. Proceedings of 7th IMAC, Las Vegas
[68] Pedersen EB, Jørgensen D, Riber HJ, Ballani J, Vallaghé S, Paccaud B (2019) True fatigue life calculation using digital twin concept and operational modal analysis. The 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Houston, 3969-3977
[69] Peherstorfer B, Willcox K, Gunzburger M (2018) Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. Siam Rev. 60: 550-591. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1082469
[70] Podskarbi M, Knezevic DJ (2020) Digital twin for operations-present applications and future digital thread. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4043/30553-MS
[71] Purcell E, Nejad AR, Böhm A, Sapp L, Lund J, von Bock Und Polach F, Nickerson BM, Bekker A, Gilges M, Saleh A, Lehmann B, Jacobs G, Valavi M, Kranz T (2024) On methodology for a digital twin of ship propulsion under harsh environmental conditions. ASME 2024 43rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2024-124047
[72] Rasheed A, San O, Kvamsdal T (2020) Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access 8: 21980-22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143
[73] Ren W, Chen H (2010) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method. Eng. Struct. 32: 2455-2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.019
[74] Ren X, Tao L, Nuernberg M, Ramzanpoor I (2022) Interaction of offshore support vessel with adjacent offshore wind turbine during maintenance operation. ASME 2022 41st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2022-79109
[75] Renugadevi A, Nallayarasu S, Karunanithi S (2021) Evaluation of residual life of existing offshore platforms in western offshore, india. ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Online, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-62714
[76] Rosen R, Von Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD (2015) About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-Papersonline 48: 567-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141
[77] Saidou Sanda M, Gauron O, Turcotte N, Lamarche CP, Paultre P, Talbot M, Laflamme JF (2018) Efficient finite elements model updating for damage detection in bridges. In: Conte, J.P., Astroza, R., Benzoni, G., Feltrin, G., Loh, K. J., Moaveni, B. (Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 293-305
[78] Schaumann P, Böker C (2008) Numerical consideration of local joint flexibilities. The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Hawaii
[79] Semeraro C, Lezoche M, Panetto H, Dassisti M (2021) Digital twin paradigm: a systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. 130: 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469
[80] Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R, Glaessgen E, Kemp C, Lemoigne J, Wang L (2012) Nasa technology roadmap: modeling, simulation. Information Technology & Processing Roadmap Technology Area
[81] Sharma P, Knezevic D, Huynh P, Malinowski G (2018) RB-FEA based digital twin for structural integrity assessment of offshore structures. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston. https://doi.org/10.4043/29005-MS
[82] Shittu AA, Mehmanparast A, Hart P, Kolios A (2021) Comparative study between SN and fracture mechanics approach on reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine jacket foundations. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 215: 107838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107838
[83] Simoen E, De Roeck G, Lombaert G (2015) Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 56: 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001
[84] Song X, Lv L, Sun W, Zhang J (2019) A radial basis function-based multi-fidelity surrogate model: exploring correlation between high-fidelity and low-fidelity models. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 60: 965-981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02248-0
[85] Tang D, Wang Z, Yue Q, Shi Z, Feng J (2015) Modal analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom dynamic system based on non-stationary response data. J. Sound Vibr. 347: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.008
[86] Tao F, Liu W, Zhang M, Hu T, Qi Q, Zhang H, Sui Y, Wang T, Xu H, Huang Z (2019) Digital twin five-dimensional model and its application in ten fields. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 25: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2019.01.001
[87] Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM (2011) Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. (1): 154798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/154798
[88] Tygesen UT, Jepsen MS, Vestermark J, Dollerup N, Pedersen A (2018) The true digital twin concept for fatigue re-assessment of marine structures. ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77915
[89] Tygesen UT, Worden K, Rogers T, Manson G, Cross EJ (2019) State-of-the-art and future directions for predictive modelling of offshore structure dynamics using machine learning, Cham
[90] van Dinter R, Tekinerdogan B, Catal C (2022) Predictive maintenance using digital twins: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol., 107008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107008
[91] Veritas N (2000) Environmental conditions and environmental loads. Det Norske Veritas Oslo, Norway
[92] Wang FY, Xu YL, Zhan S (2017) Multi-scale model updating of a transmission tower structure using kriging meta-method. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24: e1952. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1952
[93] Wang P, Tian X, Peng T, Luo Y (2018) A review of the state-of-the-art developments in the field monitoring of offshore structures. Ocean Eng. 147: 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.10.014
[94] Wang R, Fang Y, Lin Z, Dou P (2016) Multi-scale analysis of residual strength of offshore platforms with pitting corrosion. Engineering Mechanics 33: 238-245. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.06.0524
[95] Wang S, Li Y, Li H (2015) Structural model updating of an offshore platform using the cross model cross mode method: an experimental study. Ocean Eng. 97: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.007
[96] Wang Y, Tao F, Zhang M, Wang L, Zuo Y (2021) Digital twin enhanced fault prediction for the autoclave with insufficient data. J. Manuf. Syst. 60: 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.05.015
[97] Weng S, Xia Y, Xu Y, Zhu H (2011) Substructure based approach to finite element model updating. Comput. Struct. 89: 772-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.02.004
[98] Wu W, Liu M, Yu S, Wang Y (2019) Current model analysis of South China sea based on empirical orthogonal function (EOF) decomposition and prototype monitoring data. J. Ocean Univ. 18: 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-019-3812-y
[99] Xia Y, Hao H, Brownjohn JM, Xia PQ (2002) Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31: 1053-1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.137
[100] Xu C, Liu G, Li Z, Huang Y (2020) Multiaxial fatigue life prediction of tubular k-joints using an alternative structural stress approach. Ocean Eng. 212: 107598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107598
[101] Yan T, Wang W, Zhao H, Zhou G (2021) Development of structure monitoring systems and digital twin technology of active jacket platforms. China Mechanical Engineering 32: 2508. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2021.20.014
[102] Yeter B, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2016) Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures. Int. J. Fatigue 87: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.007
[103] Yin H, Ma J, Dong K, Peng Z, Cui P, Yang C (2019) Model updating method based on kriging model for structural dynamics. Shock Vib. (1): 8086024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8086024
[104] Yin T, Zhu HP (2020) An efficient algorithm for architecture design of Bayesian Neural Network in structural model updating. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35: 354-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12492
[105] Yin Z, Lu Z, Liu J, Wang L (2022) Quantifying uncertainty for structural damage identification in the presence of model errors from a deterministic sensitivity-based regime. Eng. Struct. 267: 114685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114685
[106] Yu Y, Chan T, Sun ZH, Li ZX (2012) Mixed-dimensional consistent coupling by multi-point constraint equations for efficient multi-scale modeling. Adv. Struct. Eng. 15: 837-853. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.5.837
[107] Yuan Z, Liang P, Silva T, Yu K, Mottershead JE (2019) Parameter selection for model updating with global sensitivity analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 115: 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.048
[108] Zhang L, Zhou L, Horn BK (2021) Building a right digital twin with model engineering. J. Manuf. Syst. 59: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.009
[109] Zhang M, Tao F, Huang B, Nee A (2021) A physical model and data-driven hybrid prediction method towards quality assurance for composite components. Cirp Annals 70: 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.062
[110] Zhao S, Chen C, Fan T (2019) Fatigue assessment of crack growth based on failure assessment diagrams for a semi-submersible platform. Brodogradnja: Teorija I Praksa Brodogradnje I Pomorske Tehnike 70: 11-24. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod70102
[111] Zhao Y, Dong S, Jiang F, Guedes Soares C (2020) System reliability analysis of an offshore jacket platform. J. Ocean Univ. 19: 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-020-4181-2
[112] Zhu H, Li J, Tian W, Weng S, Peng Y, Zhang Z, Chen Z (2021) An enhanced substructure-based response sensitivity method for finite element model updating of large-scale structures. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 154: 107359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107359

Memo

Memo:
v
Last Update: 2025-10-24