|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Mojtaba Mokhtari,Robert E. Melchers.Discussion on “Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0”[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2025,(1):249-251.[doi:10.1007/s11804-024-00565-5]
Click and Copy

Discussion on “Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0”

Info

Title:
Discussion on “Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0”
Author(s):
Mojtaba Mokhtari1; 2;  Robert E. Melchers2
Affilations:
Author(s):
Mojtaba Mokhtari1; 2;  Robert E. Melchers2
1. Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;
2. Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-024-00565-5
Abstract:
-

References:

Abdelghani M, Tewfik G, Djahida D, Sid Ahmed S (2018) Prediction of the rupture pressure of transmission pipelines with corrosion defects. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 140(4): 041701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039698
ASME (1984) Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ANSI/ASME B31G-1984
ASME (1991) Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B31G-1991
Benjamin AC, Freire J, Vieira RD, de Castro JT (2002) Burst tests on pipeline with nonuniform depth corrosion defects. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2002-28065
Benjamin AC, Vieira RD, Freire JLF, de Castro JT (2000) Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion. 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, V002T06A013. DOI: 10.1115/IPC2000-193
Cabral HL, Willmersdorf RB, Afonso SM, Lyra PR, De Andrade EQ (2007) Development of computational tools for automatic modeling and FE analysis of corroded pipelines. International Journal of Modeling and Simulation for the Petroleum Industry 1(1): 9-22
Cai J, Jiang X, Yang Y, Lodewijks G, Wang M (2022) Data-driven methods to predict the burst strength of corroded line pipelines subjected to internal pressure. Journal of Marine Science and Application 21(2): 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0
Callister WD (1997) Materials science and engineering. Wiley
Chen BQ, Videiro PM, Guedes Soares C (2022) Opportunities and challenges to develop digital twins for subsea pipelines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10(6): 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10060739
Chena Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li X, Zhou J (2015) Failure analysis of high strength pipeline with single and multiple corrosions. Materials and Design 67: 552-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.088
Choi J, Goo B, Kim J, Kim Y, Kim W (2003) Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 80(2): 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X
Cronin D, Pick R (2000) Experimental database for corroded pipe: evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G. Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, V002T06A010. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2000-190
CSA (2007) Gas pipeline systems. CSA standard, Z662-07
DNVGL (2017a) Corroded pipelines. DNVGL, DNVGL-RP-F101
DNVGL (2017b) Submarine pipeline systems. DNVGL, DNVGL-ST-F101
Freire JLF, Vieira RD, Castro JTP, Benjamin AC (2006) Part 3: Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Experimental Techniques 30(6): 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00109.x
Gao J, Yang P, Li X, Zhou J, Liu J (2019) Analytical prediction of failure pressure for pipeline with long corrosion defect. Ocean Engineering 191: 106497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106497
Kiefner JF, Vieth PH (1989) A modified criterion for evaluating the remaining strength of corroded pipe. Technical report, Battelle Columbus Div., OH (USA), PR-3-805
Kiefner JF, Vieth PH (1990) New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil and Gas Journal 88: 32
Leis B, Stephens D (1997) An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe-part I: current status. The Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Mok D, Pick R, Glover A, Hoff R (1991) Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 46(2): 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(91)90015-T
Mokhtari M, Melchers RE (2016) Advanced numerical method for failure assessment of corroded steel pipes. 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference
Mokhtari M, Melchers RE (2018) A new approach to assess the remaining strength of corroded steel pipes. Engineering Failure Analysis 93: 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.07.011
Mokhtari M, Melchers RE (2019) Next-generation fracture prediction models for pipes with localized corrosion defects. Engineering Failure Analysis 105: 610-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.094
Mondal BC, Dhar AS (2019) Burst pressure of corroded pipelines considering combined axial forces and bending moments. Engineering Structures 186: 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.010
Motta RdS, Afonso SM, Willmersdorf RB, Lyra PR, de Andrade EQ (2010) Automatic modeling and analysis of pipelines with colonies of corrosion defects. Mecánica Computacional 29(80): 7871-7890
Mustaffa Z, van Gelder P (2010) A review and probabilistic analysis of limit state functions of corroded pipelines. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, 626-632
Netto TA, Ferraz US, Estefen SF (2005) The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61: 1185-1204
Pimentel JT, Marques Ferreira AD, de Siqueira Motta R, Figueiroa da Silva Cabral MA, Maria Bastos Afonso S, Brito Willmersdorf R, Maciel Lyra PR, de Andrade EQ, da Silveira Cunha DJ (2020) New procedure of automatic modeling of pipelines with realistic shaped corrosion defects. Engineering Structures 221: 11030
Silva R, Guerreiro J, Drach P (2008) Automatic finite element solid modeling, burst and error analyses of corroded pipelines. International Journal of Mechanics 2(3): 77-86
Stephens DR, Leis BN (1997) Material and geometry factors controlling the failure of corrosion defects in piping. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division PVP 350: 3-11
Stephens DR, Leis BN, Kurre M (2000) Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to high-toughness pipe. 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, V002T06A012. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2000-192
Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C, Netto TA, Estefen SF (2008) Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 85(4): 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.09.002
Yeom KJ, Lee Y-K, Oh KH, Kim WS (2015) Integrity assessment of a corroded API X70 pipe with a single defect by burst pressure analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis 57: 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.024
Zhou W, Huang G (2012) Model error assessments of burst capacity models for corroded pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 99: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.06.001

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2022-9-20;Accepted date:2023-4-21。
Corresponding author:Mojtaba Mokhtari,E-mail:mojtaba.mokhtari@ntnu.no
Last Update: 2025-02-26