|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Tatiana A. Fedorova,Vladimir A. Ryzhov,Nikolay N. Semenov,et al.Optimization of an Underwater Wireless Sensor Network Architecture with Wave Glider as a Mobile Gateway[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2022,(2):179-196.[doi:10.1007/s11804-022-00268-9]
Click and Copy

Optimization of an Underwater Wireless Sensor Network Architecture with Wave Glider as a Mobile Gateway

Info

Title:
Optimization of an Underwater Wireless Sensor Network Architecture with Wave Glider as a Mobile Gateway
Author(s):
Tatiana A. Fedorova1;  Vladimir A. Ryzhov1;  Nikolay N. Semenov2;  Shaharin A. Sulaiman3
Affilations:
Author(s):
Tatiana A. Fedorova1;  Vladimir A. Ryzhov1;  Nikolay N. Semenov2;  Shaharin A. Sulaiman3
1. Department of Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, 3 Lotsmanskaya, Saint Petersburg, 190121, Russia;
2. Department of Marine Information Systems and Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, 3 Lotsmanskaya, Saint Petersburg, 190121, Russia
Keywords:
Underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN)|Wave glider (WG)|Sensor network architecture|Mobile gateway|Hydroacoustic communication
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-022-00268-9
Abstract:
This paper presents an original probabilistic model of a hybrid underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN), which includes a network of stationary sensors placed on the seabed and a mobile gateway. The mobile gateway is a wave glider that collects data from the underwater network segment and retransmits it to the processing center. The authors consider the joint problem of optimal localization of stationary network nodes and the corresponding model for bypassing reference nodes by a wave glider. The optimality of the network is evaluated according to the criteria of energy efficiency and reliability. The influence of various physical and technical parameters of the network on its energy efficiency and on the lifespan of sensor nodes is analyzed. The analysis is carried out for networks of various scales, depending on the localization of stationary nodes and the model of bypassing the network with a wave glider. As a model example, the simulation of the functional characteristics of the network for a given size of the water area is carried out. It is shown that in the case of a medium-sized water area, the model of "bypassing the perimeter" by a wave glider is practically feasible, energy efficient and reliable for hourly data measurements. In the case of a large water area, the cluster bypass model becomes more efficient.

References:

Ahn J, Syed A, Krishnamachari B, Heidemann J (2011) Design and analysis of a propagation delay tolerant ALOHA protocol for underwater networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 9:752-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.09.007
Barnes CR, Team NC (2007) Building the world’s first regional cabled ocean observatory (NEPTUNE):realities, challenges and opportunities. In:OCEANS. IEEE, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2007.4449319
Brekhovskikh LM, Lysanov YuP (2003) Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics. 3rd Edition. Springer, 278
Choudhary M, Goyal N (2021) Node deployment strategies in underwater wireless sensor network. In Proceedings 2021 International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 773-779. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICA-CITE51222.2021.9404617
Choudhary M, Goyal N (2022) Dynamic Topology Control Algorithm for Node Deployment in Mobile Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Willey Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6942
Crout RL, Conlee DT, and Bernard LJ (2006) National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) National Backbone Contributions to the Integrated Ocean Observation System (IOOS). In:OCEANS 2006, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2006.30.307073
Domingo MC (2012) An overview of the internet of underwater things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(6):1879-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.07.012
Fattah S, Gani A, Ahmedy I, Idris MYI, Hashem IAT (2020) A survey on underwater wireless sensor networks:requirements, taxonomy, recent advances, and open research challenges. Sensors, 20, 5393, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185393
Felemban E, Shaikh FK, Qureshi UM, Sheikh AA, Bin Qaisar S (2015) Underwater sensor network applications:a comprehensive survey. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 11(11):14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/896832
Grund M, Freitag L, Preisig J, Ball K (2006) The PLUSNet underwater communications system:acoustic telemetry for undersea surveillance. In:IEEE OCEANS 2006, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2006.307036
Han G, Zhang C, Shu L, Sun N, Li Q (2013) A survey on deployment algorithms in underwater acoustic sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/314049
Ho T, Hagaseth M, Rialland A, Ornulf J, Rodseth O, Criado R, Zi-aragkas G (2018) Internet of Things at Sea:Using AIS and VHF over Satellite in Remote Areas. In:Proceedings of 7th Transport Research Arena TRA-2018, April 16-19, Vienna, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1473565.
Kaneda Y, Kawaguchi K, Araki E, Matsumoto H, Nakamura T, Kamiya S, Ariyoshi K, Hori T (2009) Dense ocean floor network for earthquakes and tsunamis (DONET) around the Nankai trough mega thrust earthquake seismogenic zone in southwestern Japan-Part 2:Real time monitoring of the seismogenic zone. In:International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Paper No:OMAE2009-79599, 715-720. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-79599
Khan A, Ali I, Ghani A, Khan N, Alsaqer M, Ur Rahman A, Mahmood H (2018) Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks:Taxonomy, Research Challenges, Routing Strategies and Future Directions. Sensors, 18, 1619, 30p. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051619
Lan H, Lv Y, Jin J, Li J, Sun D, and Yang Z (2021) Acoustical observation with multiple wave gliders for Internet of Underwater Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(4):2814-2825. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3020862
Li X, Xu X, Yan L, Zhao H, and Zhang T (2019) Energy-efficient data collection using autonomous underwater glider:a reinforcement learning formulation. Sensors, 20(13):3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133758
Lindsey S and Raghavendra CS (2012) PEGASIS:Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In:Proceedings IEEE Aerospace Conference, Vol. 3, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 9-16 March, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2002.1035242
Mahmood T, Akhtar F, Ur Rehman K, Ali S, Mokbal FM, and Daudpota S (2019) A comprehensive survey on the performance analysis of underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSN) routing protocols. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(5):590-600. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJAC-SA.2019.0100576
Mansouri D, Ioualalen M (2016) Adapting LEACH algorithm for underwater wireless sensor networks. In:Proceedings ICCGI 2016:The Eleventh International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology, 36-40
Menon VG, Midhunchakkaravarthy D, Sujith A, John S, Li X, Khosravi MR (2022) Towards energy-efficient and delay-optimized opportunistic routing in underwater acoustic sensor networks for IoUT platforms:an overview and new suggestions. Comput Intell Neurosci, 7061617. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7061617
Nain M, Goyal N, Awasthi LK, Malik A (2022) A range based node localization scheme with hybrid optimization for underwater wireless sensor network. International Journal of Communication Systems. March 2022, e51470. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5147
Nikushchenko DV, Ryzhov VA, Tryaskin NV (2019) Modeling hydrodynamic characteristics of wave glider. XII All-Russian Congress on Fundamental Problems of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Ufa, August 19-24. Proceedings, 71-73
Oke P and Sakov P (2012) Assessing the footprint of a regional ocean observing system. Journal of Marine Systems, vol. 105, pp. 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.05.009
Ovchinnikov KD, Ryzhov VA, Sinishin AA, Kozhemyakin IV (2020) Experimental study of running characteristics of wave glider. Proceedings of XV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference"Advanced Systems and Control Problems", Southern Federal University Press, 91-97
Rossi PS, Ciuonzo D, Ekman T, Dong H (2014) Energy detection for MIMO decision fusion in underwater sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(3):1630-1640. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2364856
Riser SC, Freeland HJ, Roemmich D, Wijffels S, Troisi A, Belbeoch M, Gilbert D, Xu J, Pouliquen S, Thresher A et al (2016) Fifteen years of ocean observations with the global Argo array. Nature Climate Change, 6(2):145-153. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2872
Rizvi HH, Khan SA, Enam RN, Nisar K, Haque MR (2022) Analytical model for underwater wireless sensor network energy consumption reduction. Computers, Materials&Continua, 72(1):1611-1626. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.023081
Ryabinin V, Barbière J, Haugan P (2019) The UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development. In Oceanobs’19:An Ocean of Opportunity. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00470
Samy A, Wang X, Hawbani A, Alsamhi S, Aziz SA (2022) Routing protocols classification for underwater wireless sensor networks based on localization and mobility. Wireless Networks, 28(2):797-826 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02880-z
Sheehy MT, Halley R (1957) Measurement of the attenuation of low-frequency sound. J Acoust Soc Amer, 29(4):464-469. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908930
Su X, Ullah I, Liu X, and Choi D (2020) A review of underwater localization techniques, algorithms, and challenges. Journal of Sensors, Article ID 6403161, 24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6403161
Su Y, Zhang L, Li Y, Yao X (2020) A glider-assist routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks with trajectory prediction methods. IEEE Access, 8, 154560-154572. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015856
Toma DM, O’Reilly T, del Rio T, Headley K, Manuel A, Broring A, Edgington D (2011) Smart sensors for interoperable smart ocean environment. In:OCEANS 2011 IEEE-Spain, 1-4
Urik RJ (1967) Principles of Underwater Sound for Engineers. N.Y.-London-Toronto-Sydney, 342
Wallace DW, de Young B, Iverson S, LaRoche J, Whoriskey F, Lewis M, Archambault P, Davidson F, Gilbert D, Greenan B (2014) A Canadian Contribution to an Integrated Atlantic Ocean Observing System (IAOOS). In:Oceans-St. John’s IEEE, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2014.7003244
Wang L, Li Y, Liao Y, Pan K, Zhang W (2018) Course control of unmanned wave glider with heading information fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(10):7997-8007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2884237
Xing G, Chen Y, He L, Su W, Hou R, Li W, Zhang C, Chen X (2019) Energy consumption in relay underwater acoustic sensor networks for NDN. IEEE Access, 7:42694-42702. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907693
Yan J, Xu Z, Luo X (2019) Feedback-based target localization in underwater sensor networks:a multisensor fusion approach. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process Over Networks, 5(1):168-180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2866335

Memo

Memo:
Received date: 2022-02-21;Accepted date:2022-05-31。
Foundation item:The research was partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as part of World-class Research Center program:Advanced Digital Technologies (Contract No. 075-15-2020-903 dated 16.11.2020).
Corresponding author:Shaharin A. Sulaiman,E-mail:shaharin@utp.edu.my
Last Update: 2022-08-17