Citation:
Cheng Chin and Michael Lau.Modeling and Testing of Hydrodynamic Damping Model for a Complex-shaped Remotely-operated Vehicle for Control[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2012,(2):150-163.[doi:10.1007/s11804-012-1117-2]
Click and Copy
Modeling and Testing of Hydrodynamic Damping Model for a Complex-shaped Remotely-operated Vehicle for Control
Cheng Chin and Michael Lau.Modeling and Testing of Hydrodynamic Damping Model for a Complex-shaped Remotely-operated Vehicle for Control[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2012,(2):150-163.[doi:10.1007/s11804-012-1117-2]
Info
- Title:
- Modeling and Testing of Hydrodynamic Damping Model for a Complex-shaped Remotely-operated Vehicle for Control
- Author(s):
- Cheng Chin and Michael Lau
- Affilations:
- DOI:
- 10.1007/s11804-012-1117-2
- Abstract:
- In this paper, numerical modeling and model testing of a complex-shaped remotely-operated vehicle (ROV) were shown. The paper emphasized the systematic modeling of hydrodynamic damping using the computational fluid dynamic software ANSYS-CFXTM on the complex-shaped ROV, a practice that is not commonly applied. For initial design and prototype testing during the developmental stage, small-scale testing using a free-decaying experiment was used to verify the theoretical models obtained from ANSYS-CFXTM. Simulation results are shown to coincide with the experimental tests. The proposed method could determine the hydrodynamic damping coefficients of the ROV.
References:
Jalving B (1994). The NDRE-AUV flight controls system. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 19(4), 497-501.
Healey AJ, Lienard D (1993). Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 18(3), 327-339.
Gomes RMF, Sousa JB, Pereira FL (2003). Modelling and control of the IES project ROV. Proceedings of European Control Conference, Cambridge, UK, 1-6.
Antonelli G, Chiaverini S, Sarkar N, West M (2001). Adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle: Experimental results on ODIN. Transactions on Control Systems Technology, IEEE.
Fjellstad OE, Fossen TI (1994). Position and attitude tracking of AUVs: A quaternion feedback approach. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 19(4), 512-518.
Fossen TI (1994). Guidance and control of ocean vehicles. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fossen TI (2002). Marine control systems; guidance, navigation and control of ships. Rigs and underwater vehicles. Marine Cybernetics.
Goheen KR (1991). Modeling methods for underwater robotic vehicle dynamics. Journal of Robotic Systems, 8(3) , 295-317.
An PE, Folleco A (2003). Modeling and simulation of autonomous underwater vehicles: design and implementation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 28 (2), 283-296.
Gomes RMF, Sousa JB, Pereira FL (2003). Modelling and control of the IES project ROV. Proceedings of European Control Conference, Cambridge, UK.
Goodman A (1960). Experimental techniques and methods of analysis used in submerged body research. Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Office of Naval Research.
Williams CD, Mackay M, Perron C, Muselet C (2000) The NRC-IMD marine dynamic test facility: A six-degree-of-freedom forced-motion test apparatus for underwater vehicle testing. International UUV Symposium, Newport, RI, 1-6.
Jones DA, Clarke DB, Brayshaw IB (2002). The calculationof hydrodynamic coefficients for underwater vehicles. DSTO Platforms Sciences Laboratory, Fishermans Bend, Australia, Report. DSTO-TR-1329.
Sarkar T, Sayer PG, Fraser SM (1997). A study of autonomous underwater vehicle hull forms using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25(11), 1301-1313.
Tyagi A, Sen D (2006). Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach. Ocean Engineering, 33(5), 798-809.
Wilson R, Paterson E, Stern F (2006). Unsteady RANS CFD method for naval combatant in waves. Proceedings of the 22nd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington DC, 532-549.
WS Atkins Consultants (2002). Best Practices Guidelines for Marine Applications of CFD, MARNET-CFD Report.
Conte G, Zanoli SM, Scaradozzi D, Conti A (2004). Evaluation of hydrodynamics parameters of a UUV. A preliminary study, International Symposium on Control. Communications and Signal Processing, ISCCSP, Hammamet.
MSS. Marine Systems Simulator (2010). Viewed 26.06.2011,
Eng YH (2007) Identification of hydrodynamic terms for underwater robotic vehicle. Master First Year Report, NTU, Robotic Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Eng YH, Lau WS, Low E, Seet GL, Chin CS (2009). A novel method to determine the hydrodynamic coefficients of an eyeball ROV. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1089, 11-22.
Eng YH, Lau WS, Low E, Seet GL, Chin CS (2008). Estimation of the hydrodynamic coefficients of an ROV using free Decay Pendulum motion. Engineering Letters, 16(3), 326-331.
Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 269-289.
Kim D, Choi H (2002). Laminar flow past a sphere rotating in the stream wise direction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 461, 365-386.
Johnson TA, Patel VC (1999). Flow past a sphere up to a Reynolds number of 300. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 378 (1), 19-70.
Achenbach E (1972). Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 54, 565-575.
Constantinescu GS, Pacheco R, Squires, KD (2002). Detached-Eddy simulation of flow over a sphere. AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Paper 2002-0425.
Hoerner SF (1965). Fluid-dynamic drag: Practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance. Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Washington.
Prestero T (2001). Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle. Master’s thesis, Mechanical and Oceanographic Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
Ng EYK, Tan CK (1998). Viscous flow simulation around a moving projectile and URV. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 11, 350-362.
Memo
- Memo:
- -
