|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Sahel Sohrabi,Mohammad Ali Lotfollahi Yaghin,Alireza Mojtahedi,et al.Evaluating the Impact of Degrees of Freedom on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Sloped Floating Breakwaters: An Experimental Study[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2026,(4):831-839.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00751-z]
Click and Copy

Evaluating the Impact of Degrees of Freedom on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Sloped Floating Breakwaters: An Experimental Study

Info

Title:
Evaluating the Impact of Degrees of Freedom on the Hydrodynamic Performance of Sloped Floating Breakwaters: An Experimental Study
Author(s):
Sahel Sohrabi1;  Mohammad Ali Lotfollahi Yaghin1;  Alireza Mojtahedi1;  Mehran Dadashzadeh1
Affilations:
Author(s):
Sahel Sohrabi1;  Mohammad Ali Lotfollahi Yaghin1;  Alireza Mojtahedi1;  Mehran Dadashzadeh1
Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
Keywords:
Sloped floating breakwater; Degrees of freedom; Hydrodynamic performance; Experimental analysis; Transmission coefficient; Reflection coefficient; Dissipation coefficient
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00751-z
Abstract:
This study experimentally examines the hydrodynamic performance of a sloped floating breakwater under two distinct configurations one involves a single degree of freedom (1-DOF) system, which is restricted to heave motion; the other involves a three DOF (3-DOF) system, which allows heave, surge, and pitch motions. The main objective is to investigate the effect of DOF on wave attenuation, which particularly explores reflection, transmission, and dissipation mechanisms. Experiments were performed in a wave flume at a geometric scale of 1：15 and under regular and irregular wave scenarios covering various wave heights and periods. Results indicate that the 1-DOF configuration presents superior wave attenuation performance at shorter wave periods, with transmission coefficients up to 14% lower than those of the 3-DOF system. By contrast, at longer wave periods, the 3-DOF configuration exhibits better wave energy dissipation, which achieves 4%-10% lower transmission coefficients. Analysis of Response Amplitude Operators suggests that the decreased heave motion detected in the 3-DOF system at longer wave periods is due to mooring-induced constraints and the interaction among multiple DOFs. This reduction in the heave response considerably contributes to enhanced wave energy dissipation. These outcomes emphasize the vital role of structural flexibility and DOFs in optimizing floating breakwater designs, which offer practical guidance for tailored solutions under diverse wave scenarios.

References:

[1] Aleman A, Constantin A (2020) On the decrease of kinetic energy with depth in wave–current interactions. Mathematische Annalen 378: 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-019-01910-8
[2] Chen Y, Liu Y, Meringolo DD, Hu J (2023) Study on the hydrodynamics of a twin floating breakwater by using SPH method. Coastal Engineering 179: 104230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022. 104230
[3] Christensen ED, Bingham HB, Friis APS, Larsen AK, Jensen KL (2018) An experimental and numerical study of floating breakwaters. Coastal Engineering 137: 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng. 2018.03.002
[4] Dai J, Wang CM, Utsunomiya T, Duan W (2018) Review of recent research and developments on floating breakwaters. Ocean Engineering 158: 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018. 03.083
[5] Guo J, Ji C, Zhang Y (2024) Hydrodynamic performance of a floating breakwater system under the terrain of islands and reefs: A 3D experimental study. China Ocean Engineering 38(6): 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-024-0082-2
[6] Guo W, Zou J, He M, Mao H, Liu Y (2022) Comparison of hydrodynamic performance of floating breakwater with taut, slack, and hybrid mooring systems: An SPH-based preliminary investigation. Ocean Engineering 258: 111818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111818
[7] He F, Huang Z, Law AW K (2013) An experimental study of a floating breakwater with asymmetric pneumatic chambers for wave energy extraction. Applied Energy 106: 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.013
[8] He M, Liang D, Ren B, Li J, Shao S (2023) Wave interactions with multi-float structures: SPH model, experimental validation, and parametric study. Coastal Engineering 184: 104333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104333
[9] Ji C, Cheng Y, Cui J, Yuan Z, Gaidai O (2018) Hydrodynamic performance of floating breakwaters in long wave regime: An experimental study. Ocean Engineering 152: 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.055
[10] Ji CY, Guo YC, Cui J, Yuan ZM, Ma XJ (2016) 3D experimental study on a cylindrical floating breakwater system. Ocean Engineering 125: 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016. 07.051
[11] Kar P, Sahoo T, Behera H (2019) Effect of Bragg scattering due to bottom undulation on a floating dock. Wave Motion 90: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.02.003
[12] Li Z, Liu R, Wang Z, Liang B, Xia H, Sun X, Wang X, Shi L (2024) Wave forces and dynamic pressures on pile-supported breakwaters with inclined perforated plates under regular waves. Frontiers in Marine Science 11: 1499685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024. 1499685
[13] Liang J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Li A (2022) Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics of the box-type floating breakwater with different mooring configurations. Ocean Engineering 254: 111296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111296
[14] Mansard E, Funke E (1980) The measurement of the incident and reflected spectra using the least squares method. In Proceedings of the 17th Coastal Engineering Conference ASCE Sydney: 154-172
[15] Nakamura T, Kohno T, Uemura M (1999) Performance of a floating breakwater by the use of wave slamming loss. In Proceedings of the 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
[16] Neelamani S, Rajendran R (2002) Wave interaction with ’⊥’-type breakwaters. Ocean Engineering 29(5): 561-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00030-0
[17] Ozeren Y, Wren DG, Altinakar M, Work PA (2011) Experimental investigation of cylindrical floating breakwater performance with various mooring configurations. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 137(6): 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000090
[18] Panda A, Karmakar D, Rao M (2024) Hydrodynamic performance of an H-shaped pile-restrained floating breakwater integrated with horizontal plates. Journal of Marine Science and Application 23: 776-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-024-00477-4
[19] Ren B, He M, Li Y, Dong P (2017) Application of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for modeling the wave-moored floating breakwater interaction. Applied Ocean Research 67: 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.07.011
[20] Sepehri A, Kirichek A, van den Heuvel M, van Koningsveld M (2024) Smart, sustainable, and circular port maintenance: A comprehensive framework and multi-stakeholder approach. Journal of Environmental Management 370: 122625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122625
[21] Sohrabi S, Lotfollahi Yaghin MA, Mojtahedi A, Aminfar MH, Dadashzadeh M (2024) Experimental and numerical investigation of a hybrid floating breakwater-WEC system. Ocean Engineering 303: 117613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117613
[22] Vishwakarma RD, Karmakar D (2024) Hydrodynamic analysis of different shapes of moored hybrid floating breakwater. Journal of Marine Science and Application 23: 743-761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-024-00519-x
[23] Wan C, Yang C, He M, Baldock TE, Nielsen P, Johanning L (2025) Hydrodynamic and power conversion performance of a hybrid raft-type WEC and breakwater system using SPH method. Renewable Energy 245: 122753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. 2025.122753

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2025-2-22;Accepted date:2025-5-21。<br>Corresponding author:Mehran Dadashzadeh，E-mail:mehrandadashzadeh@tabrizu.ac.ir
Last Update: 2026-10-16