|Table of Contents|

Citation:
 Zhibo Liu,Zhikai Wang,Guangyao Chu,et al.Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2025,(6):1279-1290.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00689-2]
Click and Copy

Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning

Info

Title:
Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning
Author(s):
Zhibo Liu Zhikai Wang Guangyao Chu Xiongliang Yao
Affilations:
Author(s):
Zhibo Liu Zhikai Wang Guangyao Chu Xiongliang Yao
College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
Keywords:
Underwater explosionHull girderDamage predictionDiscontinuous galerkinMachine learning
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00689-2
Abstract:
Near-field underwater explosions can cause substantial damage to offshore ship structures, presenting considerable risks to their integrity. This study focused on rapidly predicting girder structure deformation in ship hulls subjected to near-field explosions from small equivalent-weight spherical charges underwater. The Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method (RKDG) was employed to calculate the explosive load generated by the spherical charge. This load was then applied to the nonlinear finite element solver software, ABAQUS, to determine the maximum deformation of the ship hull girder structure under the impulse load. By comparing the results with experimental data, the accuracy of the proposed model was validated, confirming that the RKDG finite element coupling calculation effectively simulates the response characteristics of spherical charges in near-field explosion scenarios. Subsequently, two machine learning algorithms driven by data, namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF), were employed to dynamically predict the maximum girder structure deformation in ship hulls. The analysis demonstrated that both models successfully predicted the maximum deformation. The root mean square error for the XGBoost model (27.67) was lower than that of the RF model (50.31). The XGBoost model also fitted 96% of the training data, compared to 94% for the RF model. Moreover, the relative error of the XGBoost model (6.25%) was lower than that of the RF model (10.38%). Overall, XGBoost is highly suitable for predicting girder structure deformation in ship hulls subjected to underwater explosions.

References:

[1] Cao XF, Xiao DB, Li Y, Wen WB, Zhao T, Chen ZB, Jiang YB, Fang DN (2020) Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure. Thin-Walled Structures 148: 106586. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106586
[2] Cockburn B, Hou S, Shu CW (1990) The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case. Mathematics of Computation 54: 545-581. DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-1010597-0
[3] Cole RH (1948) Underwater explosions. Dover Publications, New York. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.48411
[4] Era IZ, Grandhi M, Liu Z (2022) Prediction of mechanical behaviors of L-DED fabricated SS 316L parts via machine learning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 121(3-4): 2445-2459. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09509-1
[5] Gan N, Yao XL, Liu LT, Xiao W, Wang XL (2019) Research on overall damage characteristics of a hull girder under explosion bubble collapse. Ocean Engineering 188: 106315. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106315
[6] Gao F, Ji C, Long Y, Cheng L, Zhao C, Wu J, Sun Y (2020) Numerical investigation of the dynamic response of CWC structures subjected to underwater explosion loading. Ocean Engineering 203: 107214. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107214
[7] He Z, Chen Z, Jiang Y, Cao X, Zhao T, Li Y (2020) Effects of the standoff distance on hull structure damage subjected to near-field underwater explosion. Marine Structures 74: 102839. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102839
[8] Jiang X, Zhang W, Li D, Chen T, Tang Y, Guo Z (2021) Experimental analysis on dynamic response of pre-cracked aluminum plate subjected to underwater explosion shock loadings. Thin-Walled Structures 159: 107256. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107256
[9] Jin Z, Yin C, Chen Y, Hua H (2017) Coupling Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method to finite element method for compressible multi-phase flow interacting with a deformable sandwich structure. Ocean Engineering 130: 597-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.013
[10] Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 21(1): 31-48. DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
[11] Li H, Zhang C, Zheng X, Mei Z, Bai X (2021) A simplified theoretical model of the whipping response of a hull girder subjected to underwater explosion considering the damping effect. Ocean Engineering 239: 109831. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109831
[12] Li H, Zhu Y, Liu K, Zou H, Chen X, Wang H (2024) Experimental study of the coupled damage characteristics of a large-scale hull girder subjected to an underwater near-field explosion. Thin-Walled Structures 196: 111547. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111547
[13] Lin S, Wang J, Liu L, Li H, Ma T, Tang K (2021) Research on damage effect of underwater multipoint synchronous explosion shock waves on air-backed clamped circular plate. Ocean Engineering 240: 109985. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109985
[14] Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF (1995) Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 20: 1081-1106. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650200824
[15] Nurick GN, Shave GC (1996) The deformation and tearing of thin square plates subjected to impulsive loads—an experimental study. International Journal of Impact Engineering 18: 99-116. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00018-2
[16] Park J (2019) Application of the Runge Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin-Direct Ghost Fluid Method to internal explosion inside a water-filled tube. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 11: 572-583. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.10.002
[17] Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay ? (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825-2830
[18] Peng YX, Zhang AM, Ming FR (2021) Numerical simulation of structural damage subjected to the near-field underwater explosion based on SPH and RKPM. Ocean Engineering 222: 108576. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108576
[19] Qiu J, Liu TG, Khoo BC (2008) Simulations of compressible two-medium flow by Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods with the ghost fluid method. Communications in Computational Physics 3: 479-504
[20] Rajendran R, Narasimhan K (2001) Damage prediction of clamped circular plates subjected to contact underwater explosion. International Journal of Impact Engineering 25: 373-386. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00051-8
[21] Sun PN, Colagrossi A, Marrone S, Zhang AM (2017) The δplus-SPH model: Simple procedures for a further improvement of the SPH scheme. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 315: 25-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.028
[22] Suresh C, Ramajeyathilagam K (2021) Large deformation behaviour of thin mild steel rectangular plates subjected to underwater explosion loading under air and water backed conditions. Applied Ocean Research 114: 102780. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102780
[23] Tang ZP, Li XY (2021) Application of the Sub-Sea Analysis (SSA) capability in numerical simulation of underwater explosion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1965(1): 012042. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1965/1/012042
[24] Wang G, Zhang S, Yu M, Li H, Kong Y (2014) Investigation of the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion near boundaries. Applied Ocean Research 46: 40-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2014.02.003
[25] Wang P, Zhang Z, Yan Q, Zhang C (2020a) A substructure method for the transient response of vertical cylinders subjected to shock wave of underwater explosion. Ocean Engineering 218: 108128. DOI.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108128
[26] Wang X, Zhang S, Wang C, Cui W, Cao K, Fang X (2020b) Blast-induced damage and evaluation method of concrete gravity dam subjected to near-field underwater explosion. Engineering Structures 209: 109996. DOI.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109996
[27] Wei ZH, Zhao ZY, Ye F, Pei YQ, Wang X, Zhang QC, Lu TJ (2021) Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock. Explosion and Shock Waves 41: 083104-083101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392
[28] Wierzbicki T (1999) Petalling of plates under explosive and impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 22: 935-954. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00028-7
[29] Zhang QL, Huang XY, Li Z (2021a) Coupled acoustic-structural analysis of a partially submerged circular RC column in an underwater explosion event: Factors to be considered for loading. Ocean Engineering 232: 109122. DOI.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109122
[30] Zhang W, Yao X, Wang Y, Wang Z (2020) Experimental study and numerical model adequacy assessment of hull structure dynamic response subject to underwater explosion. Ships and Offshore Structures 15: 1023-1036. DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1701273
[31] Zhang Z, Liu Z, Wu D (2021b) Prediction of melt pool temperature in directed energy deposition using machine learning. Additive Manufacturing 37: 101692. DOI.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101692
[32] Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhao H, Qian H, Mou J (2015) An experimental study on the dynamic response of a hull girder subjected to near field underwater explosion. Marine Structures 44: 43-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.07.002
[33] Zong Z, Zhao Y, Li H (2013) A numerical study of whole ship structural damage resulting from close-in underwater explosion shock. Marine Structures 31: 24-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.01.004

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2024-8-28;Accepted date:2025-1-26。<br>Foundation item:Supported by the Heilongjiang Provincial Excellent Youth Fund under Grant No. YQ2021E009, the Heilongjiang Provincial Key R&amp;D Program under Grant No. GZ20210210, and the National Major Program under Grant No. J2019-I-0017-0016.<br>Corresponding author:Zhikai Wang,E-mail:wangzhikai@hrbeu.edu.cn
Last Update: 2025-12-26