|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Zhenhao Zhu,Qiushuang Zheng,Hongbing Liu,et al.Prediction Model for Pipeline Pitting Corrosion Based on Multiple Feature Selection and Residual Correction[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2025,(4):805-815.[doi:10.1007/s11804-024-00468-5]
Click and Copy

Prediction Model for Pipeline Pitting Corrosion Based on Multiple Feature Selection and Residual Correction

Info

Title:
Prediction Model for Pipeline Pitting Corrosion Based on Multiple Feature Selection and Residual Correction
Author(s):
Zhenhao Zhu1;  Qiushuang Zheng2;  Hongbing Liu1;  Jingyang Zhang1;  Tong Wu1;  Xianqiang Qu1
Affilations:
Author(s):
Zhenhao Zhu1;  Qiushuang Zheng2;  Hongbing Liu1;  Jingyang Zhang1;  Tong Wu1;  Xianqiang Qu1
1. Yantai Research Institute, Harbin Engineering University, Yantai 264005, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Keywords:
Pipeline corrosion; Machine learning; Residual correction; Regularized extreme learning machine; Principal component analysis
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-024-00468-5
Abstract:
The transportation of oil and gas through pipelines is crucial for sustaining energy supply in industrial and civil sectors. However, the issue of pitting corrosion during pipeline operation poses an important threat to the structural integrity and safety of pipelines. This problem not only affects the longevity of pipelines but also has the potential to cause secondary disasters, such as oil and gas leaks, leading to environmental pollution and endangering public safety. Therefore, the development of a highly stable, accurate, and reliable model for predicting pipeline pitting corrosion is of paramount importance. In this study, a novel prediction model for pipeline pitting corrosion depth that integrates the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), regularized extreme learning machine (RELM), principal component analysis (PCA), and residual correction is proposed. Initially, RELM is utilized to forecast pipeline pitting corrosion depth, and SSA is employed for optimizing RELM’s hyperparameters to enhance the model’s predictive capabilities. Subsequently, the residuals of the SSA-RELM model are obtained by subtracting the prediction results of the model from actual measurements. Moreover, PCA is applied to reduce the dimensionality of the original 10 features, yielding 7 new features with enhanced information content. Finally, residuals are predicted by using the seven features obtained by PCA, and the prediction result is combined with the output of the SSA-RELM model to derive the predicted pipeline pitting corrosion depth by incorporating multiple feature selection and residual correction. Case study demonstrates that the proposed model reduces mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error, and mean absolute error by 66.80%, 42.71%, and 42.64%, respectively, compared with the SSA-RELM model. Research findings underscore the exceptional performance of the proposed integrated approach in predicting the depth of pipeline pitting corrosion.

References:

[1] Al-Sabaeei AM, Alhussian H, Abdulkadir SJ, Jagadeesh A (2023) Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review. Energy Reports 10: 1313-1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.009
[2] Arzaghi E, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Binns J, Chin C, Khakzad N, Reniers G (2018) Developing a dynamic model for pitting and corrosion-fatigue damage of subsea pipelines. Ocean Engineering 150: 391-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.014
[3] Ben Seghier MEA, Keshtegar B, Taleb-Berrouane M, Abbassi R, Trung NT (2021) Advanced intelligence frameworks for predicting maximum pitting corrosion depth in oil and gas pipelines. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 147: 818-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.008
[4] Cadelano G, Bortolin A, Ferrarini G, Molinas B, Giantin D, Zonta P, Bison P (2016) Corrosion detection in pipelines using infrared thermography: Experiments and data processing methods. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 35(3): 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-016-0365-5
[5] Chou JS, Ngo NT, Chong WK (2017) The use of artificial intelligence combiners for modeling steel pitting risk and corrosion rate. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 65: 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.09.008
[6] De Waard C, Milliams DE (1975) Carbonic acid corrosion of steel. Corrosion 31(5): 177-181. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-31.5.177
[7] He C, Kang H, Yao T, Li X (2019) An effective classifier based on convolutional neural network and regularized extreme learning machine. Mathematical biosciences and engineering 16(6): 8309-8321. https://doi.org/10.3934/MBE.2019420
[8] Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2004) Extreme learning machine: A new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, Budapest, Hungary, 985-990. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2004.1380068
[9] Jiang T, Ren L, Jia ZG, Li DS, Li HN (2017) Pipeline internal corrosion monitoring based on distributed strain measurement technique. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 24(11): e2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2016
[10] Li X, Guo M, Zhang R, Chen G (2022a) A data-driven prediction model for maximum pitting corrosion depth of subsea oil pipelines using SSA-LSTM approach. Ocean Engineering 261: 112062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112062
[11] Li X, Jia R, Zhang R, Yang S, Chen G (2022b) A KPCA-BRANN based data-driven approach to model corrosion degradation of subsea oil pipelines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 219: 108231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108231
[12] Li X, Zhang L, Khan F, Han Z (2021) A data-driven corrosion prediction model to support digitization of subsea operations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 153: 413-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.031
[13] Li Z, Korovin I, Shi X, Gorbachev S, Gorbacheva N, Huang W, Cao J (2023) A data-driven rutting depth short-time prediction model with metaheuristic optimization for asphalt pavements based on RIOHTrack. IEEE-CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 10(10): 1918-1932. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123192
[14] Liu G, Ayello F, Vera J, Eckert R, Bhat P (2021) An exploration on the machine learning approaches to determine the erosion rates for liquid hydrocarbon transmission pipelines towards safer and cleaner transportations. Journal of Cleaner Production 295: 126478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126478
[15] Liu H, Chen C (2019) Data processing strategies in wind energy forecasting models and applications: A comprehensive review. Applied Energy 249: 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.188
[16] Liu H, Zhang L, Liu HF, Chen S, Wang S, Wong ZZ, Yao K (2018) High-frequency ultrasonic methods for determining corrosion layer thickness of hollow metallic components. Ultrasonics 89: 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.05.006
[17] Ma H, Zhang W, Wang Y, Ai Y, Zheng W (2023) Advances in corrosion growth modeling for oil and gas pipelines: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 171: 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.054
[18] May Z, Alam MK, Nayan NA (2022) Recent advances in nondestructive method and assessment of corrosion undercoating in carbon - steel pipelines. Sensors 22(17): 6654. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176654
[19] Mousavi SS, Moghaddam AS (2020) Failure pressure estimation error for corroded pipeline using various revisions of ASME B31G. Engineering Failure Analysis 109: 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104284
[20] Ossai CI (2019) A data-driven machine learning approach for corrosion risk assessment—A comparative study. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 3(2): 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc3020028
[21] Ossai CI (2020) Corrosion defect modelling of aged pipelines with a feed-forward multi-layer neural network for leak and burst failure estimation. Engineering Failure Analysis 110: 104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104397
[22] Peng S, Chen Q, Zheng C, Liu E (2019) Analysis of particle deposition in a new-type rectifying plate system during shale gas extraction. Energy Science & Engineering 8(3): 702-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.543
[23] Peng S, Zhang Z, Liu E, Liu W, Qiao W (2021) A new hybrid algorithm model for prediction of internal corrosion rate of multiphase pipeline. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 85: 103716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103716
[24] Ren CY, Qiao W, Tian X (2012) Natural gas pipeline corrosion rate prediction model based on BP neural network. Fuzzy Engineering and Operations Research, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28592-9_47
[25] Shi F, Liu Z, Li E (2017) Prediction of pipe performance with ensemble machine learning based approaches. 2017 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control, Shanghai, China, 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDPC.2017.84
[26] Song Y, Wang Q, Zhang X, Dong L, Bai S, Zeng D, Xi Y (2023) Interpretable machine learning for maximum corrosion depth and influence factor analysis. npj Materials Degradation 7(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00324-x
[27] Sun Y, Zhang S (2024) A multiscale hybrid wind power prediction model based on least squares support vector regression-regularized extreme learning machine-multi-head attention-bidirectional gated recurrent unit and data decomposition. Energies 17(12): 2923. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122923
[28] Tan X, Fan L, Huang Y, Bao Y (2021) Detection, visualization, quantification, and warning of pipe corrosion using distributed fiber optic sensors. Automation in Construction 132: 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103953
[29] Velazquez JC, Caleyo F, Valor A, Hallen JM (2010) Field study—Pitting corrosion of underground pipelines related to local soil and pipe characteristics. Corrosion 66(1): 016001. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3318290
[30] Wang J, Wang X, Zhang J, Shang X, Chen Y, Feng Y, Tian B (2024) Soil salinity inversion in Yellow River Delta by regularized extreme learning machine based on ICOA. Remote Sensing 16(9): 1565. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091565
[31] Wei B, Chen L, Li H, Yuan D, Wang G (2020) Optimized prediction model for concrete dam displacement based on signal residual amendment. Applied Mathematical Modelling 78: 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.046
[32] Xu B, Chen Z, Wang X, Bu J, Zhu Z, Zhang H, Lu J (2023a) Combined prediction model of concrete arch dam displacement based on cluster analysis considering signal residual correction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 203: 110721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110721
[33] Xu B, Wang S, Xia H, Zhu Z, Chen X (2023b) A global sensitivity analysis method for safety influencing factors of RCC dams based on ISSA-ELM-Sobol. Structures 51: 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.027
[34] Yin S, Liu H (2022) Wind power prediction based on outlier correction, ensemble reinforcement learning, and residual correction. Energy 250: 123857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123857
[35] Zhang M, Guo Y, Xie Q, Zhang Y, Wang D, Chen J (2022) Defect identification for oil and gas pipeline safety based on autonomous deep learning network. Computer Communications 195: 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.08.001
[36] Zheng Q, Wang C, Liu W, Pang L (2022) Evaluation on development height of water-conduted fractures on overburden roof based on nonlinear algorithm. Water 14(23): 3853. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233853

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2024-5-2;Accepted date:2024-8-8。<br>Foundation item:Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2022QE091), the Special fund for Taishan Industry Leading Talent Project (tsls20230605), Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (2023CXGC010407).<br>Corresponding author:Hongbing Liu,E-mail:hb_liu@hrbeu.edu.cn
Last Update: 2025-08-27