Citation:
Eunlak Kim,Hyungmin Cho,Namgyun Kim,et al.Sensitive Resource and Traffic Density Risk Analysis of Marine Spill Accidents Using Automated Identification System Big Data[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2020,(2):173-181.[doi:10.1007/s11804-020-00138-2]
Click and Copy
Sensitive Resource and Traffic Density Risk Analysis of Marine Spill Accidents Using Automated Identification System Big Data
Eunlak Kim,Hyungmin Cho,Namgyun Kim,et al.Sensitive Resource and Traffic Density Risk Analysis of Marine Spill Accidents Using Automated Identification System Big Data[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2020,(2):173-181.[doi:10.1007/s11804-020-00138-2]
Info
- Title:
- Sensitive Resource and Traffic Density Risk Analysis of Marine Spill Accidents Using Automated Identification System Big Data
- Author(s):
- Eunlak Kim; Hyungmin Cho; Namgyun Kim; Eunjin Kim; Jewan Ryu; Heekyung Park
- Affilations:
- Keywords:
- SRTDriskanalysis; AISbigdata; Sensitiveresource; Marinespillaccidents; Marinetraffic; Trafficdensity; Marine oil spill
- DOI:
- 10.1007/s11804-020-00138-2
- Abstract:
- This study developed a new methodology for analyzing the risk level of marine spill accidents from two perspectives, namely, marine traffic density and sensitive resources. Through a case study conducted in Busan, South Korea, detailed procedures of the methodology were proposed and its scalability was confirmed. To analyze the risk from a more detailed and microscopic viewpoint, vessel routes as hazard sources were delineated on the basis of automated identification system (AIS) big data. The outliers and errors of AIS big data were removed using the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise algorithm, and a marine traffic density map was evaluated by combining all of the gridded routes. Vulnerability of marine environment was identified on the basis of the sensitive resource map constructed by the Korea Coast Guard in a similar manner to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration environmental sensitivity index approach. In this study, aquaculture sites, water intake facilities of power plants, and beach/resort areas were selected as representative indicators for each category. The vulnerability values of neighboring cells decreased according to the Euclidean distance from the resource cells. Two resulting maps were aggregated to construct a final sensitive resource and traffic density (SRTD) risk analysis map of the Busan–Ulsan sea areas. We confirmed the effectiveness of SRTD risk analysis by comparing it with the actual marine spill accident records. Results show that all of the marine spill accidents in 2018 occurred within 2 km of high-risk cells (level 6 and above). Thus, if accident management and monitoring capabilities are concentrated on high-risk cells, which account for only 6.45% of the total study area, then it is expected that it will be possible to cope with most marine spill accidents effectively.
References:
Akhtar J, Bjørnskau T, Jean-Hansen V (2011) Oil spill risk analysis of routing heavy ship traffic in Norwegian waters. WMU J Marit Aff 11(2):233-247
Astiaso Garcia D, Bruschi D, Cumo F, Gugliermetti F (2013) The oil spill hazard index (OSHI) elaboration. An oil spill hazard assessment concerning Italian hydrocarbons maritime traffic. Ocean & Coastal Management 80:1-11
Breithaupt SA, Copping A, Tagestad J, Whiting J (2016) Maritime route delineation using AIS data from the Atlantic Coast of the US. J Navig 70(2):379-394
Cheong S (2010) A social assessment of the Hebei-Spirit oil spill. GeoJournal 76(5):539-549
Cutter SL (1993) Living with risk: the geography of technological hazards. E. Arnold, London
De Andrade MM, Szlafsztein CF, Souza-Filho PW, Araújo AD, Gomes MK (2010) A socioeconomic and natural vulnerability index for oil spills in an Amazonian harbor: a case study using GIS and remote sensing. J Environ Manag 91(10):1972-1980
Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Paper presented at Kdd
Fernández-Macho J, González P, Virto J (2016) An index to assess maritime importance in the European Atlantic economy. Mar Policy 64:72-81
Goerlandt F, Montewka J (2015) Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 138:115-134
Gundlach ER, Hayes MO (1978) Vulnerability of coastal environments to oil spill impacts. Mar Technol 12(4):18-27
Hadzagic M, St-Hilaire MO, Webb S, Shahbazian E (2013) Maritime traffic data mining using R. In Information Fusion (FUSION), 2013 16th International Conference, IEEE. pp. 2041-2048
International Maritime Organization (2010). Formal safety assessment. Report of the Working Group on Environmental Risk Evaluation Criteria within the context of Formal Safety Assessment
International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (2016). The International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited oil tanker spill statistics. http://www.itopf.com/fileadmin/data/Documents/Company_Lit/Oil_Spill_Stats_2016.pdf
Kim K, Jeong JS, Park G (2014) A study on near-miss incidents from maritime traffic flow by clustering vessel positions. Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems 24(6):603-608
Korea Coast Guard (2009) Standard operating procedures manual
Korea Coast Guard (2010) Research on the construction of coast guard system
Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency (2011) Construction of coastal disaster vulnerability assessment system
Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal (2018) Accidents Data. https://www.kmst.go.kr/
Korean Statistical Information Service (2018) Statistics Data. http://kosis.kr/
Kujala P, Hänninen M, Arola T, Ylitalo J (2009) Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94(8):1349-1357
Lan D, Liang B, Bao C, Ma M, Xu Y, Yu C (2015) Marine oil spill risk mapping for accidental pollution and its application in a coastal city. Mar Pollut Bull 96(1-2):220-225
Landquist H, Hassellöv I, Rosén L, Lindgren J, Dahllöf I (2013) Evaluating the needs of risk assessment methods of potentially polluting shipwrecks. J Environ Manag 119:85-92
Lee M, Jung J (2015) Pollution risk assessment of oil spill accidents in Garorim Bay of Korea. Mar Pollut Bull 100(1):297-303
Mitchell JK (1989) Hazards research. In: Gaile GL, Willmott CJ (eds) Geography in America. Merill, Columbus, pp 410-424
National Logistics Information Center (2018) Statistics Data. http://www.nlic.go.kr/
Olita A, Cucco A, Simeone S, Ribotti A, Fazioli L, Sorgente B, Sorgente R (2012) Oil spill hazard and risk assessment for the shorelines of a Mediterranean coastal archipelago. Ocean & Coastal Management 57:44-52
Pallotta G, Vespe M, Bryan K (2013) Vessel pattern knowledge discovery from AIS data: a framework for anomaly detection and route prediction. Entropy 15(12):2218-2245
Peterson J, Michel J, Zengel S, White M, Lord C, Park C (2002) Environmental sensitivity index guidelines: Version 3.0. Seattle, WA: US Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division
Renner M, Kuletz KJ (2015) A spatial-seasonal analysis of the oiling risk from shipping traffic to seabirds in the Aleutian archipelago. Mar Pollut Bull 101(1):127-136
Roh Y, Kim C (2016) Methodology for selection and sensitivity index of socio-economic resources for marine oil spill incidents. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25(6):402-413
Ryu J, Kim J, Shin S, Park H (2016) The need of early response system to HNS accident based on case analysis. Engineering Challenges for Sustainable Future 143-146
Sepp Neves AA, Pinardi N, Martins F, Janeiro J, Samaras A, Zodiatis G, De Dominicis M (2015) Towards a common oil spill risk assessment framework-adapting ISO 31000 and addressing uncertainties. J Environ Manag 159:158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.044
Shahidul Islam M, Tanaka M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull 48(7-8):624-649
Silveira P, Teixeira A, Guedes Soares C (2013) Use of AIS data to characterise marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of Portugal. J Navig 66(6):879-898
Sormunen OE, Goerlandt F, Häkkinen J, Posti A, Hänninen M, Montewka J, Kujala P (2014) Uncertainty in maritime risk analysis: extended case study on chemical tanker collisions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M. J Eng Marit Environ 229(3):303-320
United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs (1993) Glossary: internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. United Nations, Geneva
United Nations Development Programme (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. United Nations Development Programme. Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York
Weslawski J, Wiktor J, Zajaczkowski M, Futsaeter G, Moe K (1997) Vulnerability assessment of Svalbard intertidal zone for oil spills. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 44:33-41
Memo
- Memo:
-
Received date:2018-11-03;Accepted date:2019-08-28。
Foundation item:This research was supported by a grant [KCG-01-2017-01] through the Disaster and Safety Management Institute funded by the Ministry of Public Safety and Security and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant [No. 2018R1D1A1B07050208] funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea Government.
Corresponding author:Heekyung Park,hkpark@kaist.ac.kr;Eunlak Kim,eunlak.kim@kaist.ac.kr
