|Table of Contents|

 Ali Pirouzfar,Javad Enferadi,Masoud Dehghan.Dynamic Analysis of High-Speed Boat Motion Simulator by a Novel 3-DoF Parallel Mechanism with Prismatic Actuators Based on Seakeeping Trial[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2018,(2):178-191.[doi:10.1007/s11804-018-0029-1]
Click and Copy

Dynamic Analysis of High-Speed Boat Motion Simulator by a Novel 3-DoF Parallel Mechanism with Prismatic Actuators Based on Seakeeping Trial


Dynamic Analysis of High-Speed Boat Motion Simulator by a Novel 3-DoF Parallel Mechanism with Prismatic Actuators Based on Seakeeping Trial
Ali Pirouzfar Javad Enferadi Masoud Dehghan
Ali Pirouzfar Javad Enferadi Masoud Dehghan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Motion simulatorsParallel mechanismHigh-speed boatSeakeeping trialInverse dynamicsVirtual work
In this study, we focused on a novel parallel mechanism for utilizing the motion simulator of a high-speed boat (HSB). First, we expressed the real behavior of the HSB based on a seakeeping trial. For this purpose, we recorded the motion parameters of the HSB by gyroscope and accelerometer sensors, while using a special data acquisition technique. Additionally, a Chebychev highpass filter was applied as a noise filter to the accelerometer sensor. Then, a novel 3 degrees of freedom (DoF) parallel mechanism (1T2R) with prismatic actuators is proposed and analyses were performed on its inverse kinematics, velocity, and acceleration. Finally, the inverse dynamic analysis is presented by the principle of virtual work, and the validation of the analytical equations was compared by the ADAMS simulation software package. Additionally, according to the recorded experimental data of the HSB, the feasibility of the proposed novel parallel mechanism motion simulator of the HSB, as well as the necessity of using of the washout filters, was explored.


Almeida R, Hess-Coelho T (2010) Dynamic model of a 3-dof asymmetric parallel kinematics manipulator. Open Mech Engn J 4:48-55
Carrera G, Rizzo C (2005) Measurements of motion, loads and structural response on a fast FRP pleasure craft. Transaction of fast 2005, St.Petersburg
Chou CT, Fu LC (2007a) Ships on real-time rendering dynamic ocean applied in 6-dof platform motion simulator. proceeding of CACS international conference, Taichun
Chou CT, Fu LC (2007b) VR-based motion simulator for dynamics ship on six degree-of-freedom platform. Proceeding of ICRA International Conference, Roma, Italy. pp. 65-76. SBN:1-4244-0601-3
Correia Augusto BD, Loureiro RJ (2009) Motion cueing in the chalmers driving simulator:an optimization-based control approach.Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden. Report No. EX057
Dongsu W, Hongbin G (2007) Adaptive sliding control of six-DOF flight simulator motion platform. Chin J Aeronaut 20:425-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(07)60064-8
Flint E, Anderson E (2001) Multi-degree of freedom parallel actuation system architectures for motion control. Am Inst Aero Astronaut 4750
Garcia-Murillo M, Gallardo-Alvarado J, Castillo-Castaneda E (2013) Finding the generalized forces of a series-parallel kinematics manipulator. Int J Adv Robot Syst 10:1-10. https://doi.org/10.5772/53824
Garme K, Kuttenkeuler J (2005) Simulations and full-scale trials for a HSC linked by wave-height measurements. Transaction of fast 2005, St. Petersburg
Jorgen H, Morch B, Hermundstad A (2005) Planing craft in wave:full scale measurements. Transaction of fast 2005, St. Petersburg Koekebakker SH (2001) Model based control of a flight simulator motion system, doctoral thesis. ponsen and looijenb. v., Netherlands. ISBN:90-370-0194-7
Larsen DV (2011) Comparison of three degree of freedom and six degree of freedom motion bases utilizing classical washout algorithms.Iowa State University
Li Y, Staicu S (2012) Inverse dynamics of a 3-PRC parallel kinematic machine. Nonlinear Dynamics journal 67:1031-1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0045-z
Liu G, Zheng S, Ogbobe P, Han J (2012) Inverse kinematic and dynamic analyses of the 6-UCU parallel kinematics manipulator. Appl Mech Mater 127:172-180. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.127.172
Patel Y, George P (2012) Parallel kinematics manipulators applications:a survey. Mod Mech Engn 2:57-64. https://doi.org/10.4236/mme.2012.23008
Staicu S (2009) Recursive modelling in dynamics of agile wrist spherical parallel robot. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25:409-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2008.02.001
Staicu S (2012) Matrix modeling of inverse dynamics of spatial and planar parallel robots. Multibody Syst Dyn 27:239-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-011-9281-8
Teufel HJ, Nusseck HG, Beykirch KA, Butler JS, Kerger M, Buithoff HH (2007) MPI motion simulator:development and analysis of a novel motion simulator. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies, Hilton Head SC, USA, pp. 335-345. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-6476
Tsai MS, Yuan WH (2010) Inverse dynamics analysis for a 3-PRS parallel kinematics manipulator based on a special decomposition of the reaction forces. Mech Mach Theory 45:1491-1508
Ueng SK, Lin D, Liu CH (2008) A ship motion simulation system.Virtual Reality Journal 12:65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-008-0088-8
Utkan EU, Tokmak HS, Cagiltay K, Isler K, Eryilmaz NO (2014) A novel classification method for driving simulators based on existing flight simulator classification standards. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies 42:132-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.011
Wampler CW (2006) On a rigid body subject to point-plane constraints. J Mech Des 128:151-158. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2120787
Wang WH, Feng ZY, Yang TL, Zhang C (2010) Inverse dynamics of 2UPS-2RPS parallel kinematics manipulator based on virtual work principle. Appl Mech Mater 29:744-749
Zeraatgar H, Farsi M, Yousef Nejad Miyandehi R (2010) Development of principles of seakeeping trials of planning boat in sea waves. J Mar Engn 6:29-44
Zhao Y, Gao F (2009) Inverse dynamics of the 6-dof out-parallel kinematics manipulator by means of the principle of virtual work. Robotica 27:259-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574703005046


Received date:2017-05-05;Accepted date:2017-12-27。
Corresponding author:Javad Enferadi,javadenferadi@gmail.com
Last Update: 2018-10-11