|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Begum Doganay,Emre Akyuz,Sukru Ilke Sezer,et al.Increasing System Safety and Efficiency of Ship Main Engines Under D–S Evidential Theory and Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Approach[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2026,(4):840-854.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00706-4]
Click and Copy

Increasing System Safety and Efficiency of Ship Main Engines Under D–S Evidential Theory and Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Approach

Info

Title:
Increasing System Safety and Efficiency of Ship Main Engines Under D–S Evidential Theory and Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Approach
Author(s):
Begum Doganay1;  Emre Akyuz2;  Sukru Ilke Sezer3;  Yalcin Durmusoglu1
Affilations:
Author(s):
Begum Doganay1;  Emre Akyuz2;  Sukru Ilke Sezer3;  Yalcin Durmusoglu1
1. Department of Marine Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Tuzla 34940, Istanbul, Türkiye;
2. Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Tuzla, 34940, Istanbul, Türkiye;
3. Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, Iskenderun Technical University, Iskenderun 31200, Hatay, Türkiye
Keywords:
Ship main engine; Operational efficiency; Safety; Maritime transportation; Failure modes;  effects;  and criticality analysis
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00706-4
Abstract:
A ship’s main engine is critical to the performance, operational continuity, and safe conduct of ship operations. However, the safety and operational efficiency of a ship may be endangered because of malfunctions and problems occurring in the ship’s main engine. This study introduces a systematic approach to risk analysis considering uncertainties and integrates the failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) and Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory to evaluate prospective ship main engine failures. By analyzing ambiguous data derived from expert judgments, the D-S theory offers a more trustworthy failure assessment than the conventional FMECA. In this study, a survey was conducted on maritime experts using main engine failures in the Kongsberg Maritime Engine Room Simulator, and analyses were conducted by integrating FMECA and the D-S theory. This integration allowed for a more accurate prioritization of ship main engine critical failures. Failure modes 2.3, 2.1, and 3.6 were found to be the riskiest failures. By better managing uncertainty, this study offers a more accurate safety analysis than the conventional FMECA method and helps ship operators and marine engineers create proactive maintenance plans. The outcomes of the research are expected to provide unique contributions to maritime safety professionals, safety researchers, and safety inspectors for improving the operational safety of ship main engines.

References:

[1] Ahmed S, Gu XC (2020) Accident-based FMECA study of marine boiler for risk prioritization using fuzzy expert system. Results in Engineering 6: 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100123
[2] Ahmed S, Li T, Wu S (2022) FMECA study of cruise ship pod propulsion system based on real-ship accident using type-2 fuzzy expert system. Proceedings of the 32nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Shanghai, China, ISOPE-I-22-559
[3] Akyuz E (2017) Application of fuzzy FMEA to perform an extensive risk analysis in maritime transportation engineering. International Journal of Maritime Engineerin 159(A1): 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v159iA1.1013
[4] Akyuz E, Celik E (2018) The role of human factor in maritime environment risk assessment: A practical application on Ballast Water Treatment (BWT) system in ship. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 24(3): 653-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1396184
[5] Ariany Z, Pitana T, Vanany I (2023) Risk assessment of new ferry ship construction in Indonesia using the failure mode effect and analysis (FMEA) method. Journal of Applied Engineering Science 21(3): 872-883. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-43711
[6] Aydin M, Akyuz E, Boustras G (2024) A holistic safety assessment for cargo holds and decks fire & explosion risks under fuzzy Bayesian network approach. Safety Science 176: 106555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106555
[7] Baraldi P, Compare M, Zio E (2013) Maintenance policy performance assessment in presence of imprecision based on Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. Information Sciences 245: 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.11.003
[8] Baroroh I, Ramadhan NG, Hardianto D, Kristiyono TA (2023) Risk evaluation of ship repair delays with the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research 8(4): 605-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v8i4.19328
[9] Bowles JB, Peláez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 50(2): 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D
[10] Carmignani G (2009) An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94(4): 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008. 09.009
[11] Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, Fata CML (2017) A combinedmulti-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 169: 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017
[12] Certa A, Hopps F, Inghilleri R, La Fata CM (2017) A dempster-shafer theory-based approach to the failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 159: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.018
[13] Ceylan BO (2023) Shipboard compressor system risk analysis by using rule-based fuzzy FMEA for preventing major marine accidents. Ocean Engineering 272: 113888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng. 2023.113888
[14] Chanamool N, Naenna T (2016) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Applied Soft Computing 43: 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016. 01.007
[15] Cicek K, Demirci SME, Sengul D (2025) A hybrid failure analysis model design for marine engineering systems: A case study on alternative propulsion system. Engineering Failure Analysis 167: 108929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108929
[16] Cicek K, Turan HH, Topcu YI, Searslan MN (2010) Risk-based preventive maintenance planning using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for marine engine systems. 2010 Second International Conference on Engineering System Management and Applications, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 1-6
[17] Daya AA, Lazakis I (2022) Investigating ship system performance degradation and failure criticality using FMECA and artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering (MARTECH), Lisbon, Portugal, 1-11
[18] Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38(2): 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_3
[19] Dinmohammadi F, Alkali B, Shafiee M, Bérenguer C, Labib A (2016) Risk assessment of railway failures using the FMECA technique: A case study of the passenger door system. Urban Rail Transit 2: 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-016-0043-z
[20] Doganay B, Çavu?o?lu B, Güler ÇB (2023) A study on minimizing potential accidents in ship bunkering operation through use of failure mode and effect analysis. Journal of Marine and Engineering Technology 3(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.58771/joinmet.1291554
[21] Dutra P, Teixeira SH, Wajdowicz CTD, Duarte JMG (2024) Modified FMEA for risk management in geotechnical structures during hydraulic circuit filling of a hydroelectric power plant. Soils and Rocks 47(1): e2024014422. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2024.014422
[22] Elidolu G, Sezer SI, Akyuz E, Arslan O, Arslanoglu Y (2023) Operational risk assessment of ballasting and de-ballasting on-board tanker ship under FMECA extended evidential reasoning (ER) and rule-based Bayesian network (RBN) approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 231: 108975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108975
[23] Gaonkar RSP, Pai SP (2022) Risk assessment of starting air system of marine diesel engine using fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis. In: Johri P, Anand A, Vain J, Singh J, Quasim M (Eds.), System Assurances: Modeling and Management. Academic Press, Salt Lake City, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90240-3.00004-7
[24] Garcia PA, Schirru R (2005) A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Progress in Nuclear Energy 46(3-4): 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.03.016
[25] Goksu S, Arslan O (2023) A quantitative dynamic risk assessment for ship operation using the fuzzy FMEA: The case of ship berthing/unberthing operation. Ocean Engineering 287: 115548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115548
[26] Juhaszova D (2013) Failure analysis in development & manufacture for customer. Quality Innovation Prosperity 17(2): 89-102. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v17i2.203
[27] Kalathil MJ, Renjith VR, Augustine NR (2020) Failure mode effect and criticality analysis using dempster shafer theory and its comparison with fuzzy failure mode effect and criticality analysis: A case study applied to LNG storage facility. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 138: 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.042
[28] Kucuksahin F (2016) Diesel engine malfunctions. Birsen Publishing, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)
[29] Özsoysal OA (2008) Ship diesel engines, faults and their causes. Nobel Publishing, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)
[30] Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 79(1): 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5
[31] Priharanto YE, Yaqin RI, Marjianto G, Siahaan JP, Abrori MZL (2023) Risk assessment of the fishing vessel main engine by fuzzy-FMEA approach. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 23(2): 822-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-023-01607-w
[32] Scheu MN, Tremps L, Smolka U, Kolios A, Brennan F (2019) A systematic failure mode effects and criticality analysis for offshore wind turbine systems towards integrated condition based maintenance strategies. Ocean Engineering 176: 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.048
[33] Sezer SI, Caml?yurt G, Aydin M, Akyuz E, Boustras G, Park S (2024) A holistic risk assessment under the D–S evidential theory and FMECA approach of ship recycling process hazards in the maritime environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 30(1-2): 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2024.2312969
[34] Sezer SI, Ceylan BO, Akyuz E, Arslan O (2022) D-S evidence based FMECA approach to assess potential risks in ballast water system (BWS) on-board tanker ship. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.040
[35] Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence (Vol. 42). Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb
[36] Shams G, Hatefi SM, Nemati S (2024) A Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for environmental risk assessment in failure modes and effects analysis of Oil and Gas Exploitation Plant. Scientia Iranica 31(18): 1674-1690
[37] Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P (2005) Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 22(9): 986-1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510625248
[38] Siahaan JP, Yaqin RI, Priharanto YE, Abrori M, Siswantoro N (2024) Risk-based maintenance strategies on fishing vessel refrigeration systems using Fuzzy-FMEA. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 24: 855-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-024-01878-x
[39] Siswantoro N, Priyanta D, Zaman MB (2020) Failure mode and effect criticality analysis (FMECA) fuzzy to evaluate critical level on main engine supporting system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 557(1): 012036. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/557/1/012036
[40] Talay AA, Deniz C, Durmu?o?lu Y (2014) Analysis of the effects of efficiency improvement methods on CO2 emission reduction in ships. Journal of ETA Maritime Science 2(1): 61-74
[41] Uflaz E, Sezer SI, Tunçel AL, Aydin M, Akyuz E, Arslan O (2024) Quantifying potential cyber-attack risks in maritime transportation under Dempster–Shafer theory FMECA and rule-based Bayesian network modelling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 243: 109825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109825
[42] Wang R, Chen Z, Zhou T, Xia Y (2021) Failure criticality evaluation of ship propeller shaft system based on Fuzzy FMECA method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1820(1): 012117. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1820/1/012117
[43] Zhang X, Wei R, Wu Z, Dong L, Liu H (2023) Risk assessment and reliability analysis of oil pump unit based on DS evidence theory. Energies 16(13): 4887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16134887
[44] Zhou Q, Li H, Zeng X, Li L, Cui S, Du Z (2024) A quantitative safety assessment for offshore equipment evaluation using fuzzy FMECA: A case study of the hydraulic submersible pump system. Ocean Engineering 293: 116611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116611
[45] Zuki MSNM, Ishak I, Kamal IZM, Mansor MN, Ahmed YA (2023) Risk assessment of marine high-speed diesel engine failures onboard naval vessels using failure mode and effect analysis. In: Ismail A, Zulkipli FN, Yaakup S, Öchsner A (Eds.), Materials and Technologies for Future Advancement. Springer, Cham, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38993-1_11

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2025-2-12;Accepted date:2025-4-7。<br>Corresponding author:Begum Doganay，E-mail:doganaybe@itu.edu.tr
Last Update: 2026-10-16