|Table of Contents|

Citation:
 M. Silveira,S. Wang,C. Guedes Soares.Multi-Phase CFD Simulation of Lifeboat Free-Fall Launch Dynamics with Varying Pitch Angles[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2026,(3):657-668.[doi:10.1007/s11804-026-00813-w]
Click and Copy

Multi-Phase CFD Simulation of Lifeboat Free-Fall Launch Dynamics with Varying Pitch Angles

Info

Title:
Multi-Phase CFD Simulation of Lifeboat Free-Fall Launch Dynamics with Varying Pitch Angles
Author(s):
M. Silveira S. Wang C. Guedes Soares
Affilations:
Author(s):
M. Silveira S. Wang C. Guedes Soares
Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, 1600-214, Portugal
Keywords:
CFD simulationWater entryFree-fall launchLifeboatOverset mesh
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-026-00813-w
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to simulate the free-fall launch of a lifeboat and to analyse its trajectory, pitch angle, velocity, acceleration, and pressure dynamics using Open Field Operation and Manipulation (OpenFOAM). Utilising the overset grid technique, which is well-suited for handling the expected large motions, the study employs multi-phase simulations based on the volume of fluid method. A series of 21 simulations is conducted, varying initial pitch angles and three different drop heights to thoroughly examine the lifeboat’s behaviour under various conditions. The analysis of pressure across multiple points along the same transversal and longitudinal planes reveals two significant pressure peaks: one at the bow during water entry and another at the stern, occurring after a secondary water entry triggered by turn-back spins due to restoring moments. Pressure contours indicate that the keel experiences the highest loads, highlighting it as a critical area of concern. Additionally, the kinematics of each scenario is analysed to determine which initial pitch angle would allow the lifeboat to distance itself most effectively from potential hazards without additional impulse. This aspect of the study aims to identify optimal launch conditions that enhance safety and minimise risk during emergency deployments.

References:

[1] Albadawi A, Donoghue DB, Robinson AJ, Murray DB, Delauré YM (2013) Influence of surface tension implementation in Volume of Fluid and coupled Volume of Fluid with Level Set methods for bubble growth and detachment. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 53: 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.01.005
[2] Benites-Munoz D, Huang L, Anderlini E, Marín-Lopez JR, Thomas G (2020) Hydrodynamic Modelling of An Oscillating Wave Surge Converter Including Power Take-Of. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8(10): 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100771
[3] Chen Z, Jiao J, Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2023) CFD-FEM simulation of water entry of a wedged grillage structure into Stokes waves. Ocean Engineering 275: 114159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114159
[4] Guo R, Zan Y, Wang S, Li Z, Han D, Li M (2025) Time-varying hydrodynamic loads on a remotely operated vehicle during water entry. Ocean Engineering 341: 122843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122843
[5] Hosseinzadeh S, Tabri K, Topa A, Hirdaris S (2023) Slamming loads and responses on a non-prismatic stiffened aluminium wedge: Part II. Numerical simulations. Ocean Engineering 279: 114309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114309
[6] Huang L, Tavakoli S, Li M, Dolatshah A, Pena B, Ding B, Dashtimanesh A (2021) CFD analyses the water entry process of a free-fall lifeboat. Ocean Engineering 232: 109115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109115
[7] Huang X, Sun P, Lyu H, Zhang AM (2022) Water entry problems simulated by an axisymmetric SPH model with VAS scheme. Journal of Marine Science and Application 21(2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00265-y
[8] IMO (1991) Resolution A.689. IMO
[9] Kauczynski WE, Werenskiold P, Narten F (2009) Documentation of operational limits of free-fall lifeboats by combining model tests, full-scale tests, and computer simulation. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering Volume 2: Structures, Safety and Reliability, 2. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-79959
[10] Lyu HG, Sun PN, Miao JM and Zhang AM (2022) 3D multiresolution SPH modeling of the water entry dynamics of free-fall lifeboats. Ocean Engineering 257: 111648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111648
[11] Netherlands Regulatory Framework-Maritime (1993) 616 Evaluation of Free-fall Lifeboats launch performance. Retrieved from Netherlands Regulatory Framework (NeRF)-Maritime: https://puc.overheid.nl/nsi/doc/PUC_1746_14/1/
[12] Pearce C (2020) BBC Science Focus Magazine. Retrieved from BBC Science Focus Magazine: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/whats-the-maximum-speed-a-human-can-withstand/
[13] Qiu S, Ren H, Li H (2020) Computational Model for Simulation of Lifeboat Free-Fall during Its Launching from Ship in Rough Seas. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8090631
[14] Qiu S, Ren H, Wang N, Liu H (2023) 3D motion model for the freefall lifeboat during its launching from a moving ship. Ocean Engineering 278: 114363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114363
[15] Ringsberg JW, Heggelund S, Lara P, Jang BS, Hirdaris SE (2017) Struc-tural response analysis of slamming impact on free fall lifeboats. Marine Structures 54: 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.03.004
[16] Shen Z, Hsieh YF, Ge Z, Korpus R, Huan J (2016) Slamming Load Prediction Using Overset CFD Methods. Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/27254-MS
[17] Sun H, Faltinsen OM (2007) The influence of gravity on the performance of planing vessels in calm water. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 58: 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-006-9107-5
[18] Tavakoli S, Mikkola T, Hirdaris S (2023) A fluid–solid momentum exchange method for the prediction of hydroelastic responses of flexible water entry problems. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 965: A19. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.386
[19] Tisovska P (2019) Description of the overset mesh approach in ESI version of Open-FOAM. In Proceedings of CFD with OpenSource Software. https://doi.org/10.17196/OS_CFD#YEAR_2019
[20] Von Karman TH (1929) The impact on seaplane floats during landing (No. NACA-TN-321)
[21] Wagner H (1932) Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgänge an der Oberfläche von Flüssigkeiten. ZAMM-Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 12(4): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19320120402
[22] Wang D, Fan N, Liang B, Chen G, Chen S (2024a) A comprehensive review of water entry/exit of lifeboats and occupant safety. Ocean Engineering 310: 118768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118768
[23] Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2017) Review of ship slamming loads and responses. Journal of Marine Science and Application 16(4): 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1437-3
[24] Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2020) Effects of compressibility, three-dimensionality and air cavity on a free-falling wedge cylinder. Ocean Engineering 217: 107–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107589
[25] Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2025) Statistical characterization on slamming and green water impact onto a chemical tanker in extreme sea conditions. Marine Structures 103: 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2025.103818
[26] Wang S, Klein M, Ehlers S, Clauss G, Guedes Soares C (2024b) Analysis of the behavior of a chemical tanker in extreme waves. Journal of Marine Science and Application 23(4): 877–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-024-00508-0
[27] Wang S, Xiang G, Guedes Soares C (2021) Assessment of three-dimensional effects on slamming load predictions using OpenFoam. Applied Ocean Research 112: 102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102646
[28] Wu GX, Xu GD, Duan WY (2010) A summary of water entry problem of a wedge based on the fully nonlinear velocity potential theory. Journal of Hydrodynamics 22(5): 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60042-X
[29] Zhao R, Faltinsen O (1993) Water entry of two-dimensional bodies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 246: 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209300028X

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2025-7-10。<br>Foundation item:This work was performed within the Strategic Research Plan of the Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), which is financed by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Funda&#231;&#227;o para a Ci&#234;ncia e Tecnologia-FCT) under contract UID-00134-2025. Open access funding provided by FCT∣FCCN (b-on).<br>Corresponding author:S. Wang,E-mail:shan.wang@centec.tecnico.ulisboa.pt
Last Update: 2026-06-25