|Table of Contents|

Citation:
 Yao Zhou,Jia Wang,Zhigao Wang,et al.Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2026,(3):643-656.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00790-6]
Click and Copy

Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall

Info

Title:
Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall
Author(s):
Yao Zhou123 Jia Wang14 Zhigao Wang14 Tao Shi4 Xuanlie Zhao124 Jing Geng124 C. Guedes Soares34
Affilations:
Author(s):
Yao Zhou123 Jia Wang14 Zhigao Wang14 Tao Shi4 Xuanlie Zhao124 Jing Geng124 C. Guedes Soares34
1 College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Power Equipment, Harbin, 150040, China;
3 Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, 1049001, Portugal;
4 Sanya Nanhai Innovation and Development Base of Harbin Engineering University, Sanya, 572024, China
Keywords:
Potential theoryCoastal reflectionHydrodynamic performanceBoundary element methodHeave plate
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00790-6
Abstract:
In this paper, a numerical study is performed to investigate the hydrodynamic responses of a floating platform equipped with a heave plate adjacent to a partially reflective vertical wall. Based on the linear potential flow theory, a three-dimensional (3D) boundary element method (BEM) model, incorporating an image Green’s function, is developed to solve the wave radiation/diffraction problem in the presence of a partially reflective wall. The results confirm the efficacy of the heave plate, and the hydrodynamic response is governed by the reflection coefficient of the coast and the dimensionless distance between the coast and the platform (C/Wb, where C and Wb are the offshore distance and the width of the floating platform). Compared with open water conditions, the increasing of reflection coeffect suppresses surge motion but amplifies heave motion in the lower frequency region (ω < 0.5 rad/s). Moreover, the surge motion in the lower frequency range increases and the peak heave motion decreases as C/Wb increases within the range of 0.5–3 rad/s.

References:

[1] Amouzadrad P, Mohapatra SC, Guedes Soares C (2024) Review of recent developments on the hydroelastic response and gap resonance of multi-body floating structures. Ocean Engineering 313: 119398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119398
[2] Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Blackford LS, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Du Croz J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A, Sorensen D (1999) LAPACK users’ guide, 3rd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
[3] Bagbanci H, Karmakar D, Guedes Soares C (2012) Review of offshore floating wind turbines concepts. In: Guedes Soares C, Santos T (eds), Maritime Engineering and Technology. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering (MARTECH 2011), Taylor & Francis Group, London, 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12726-78
[4] Berkhoff JCW (1976) Mathematical models for simple harmonic linear water waves: Wave diffraction and refraction. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft
[5] Bhattacharjee J, Guedes Soares C (2010) Wave interaction with a floating rectangular box near a vertical wall with step type bottom topography. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B 22: 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60175-X
[6] Bhattacharjee J, Guedes Soares C (2011) Oblique wave interaction with a floating structure near a wall with stepped bottom. Ocean Engineering 38: 1528–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.07.011
[7] Cong P, Chen L, Gou Y (2020) Hydrodynamic interaction among multiple columns in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering 197: 106877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106877
[8] Duan W, Xu S, Xu Q, Ertekin RC, Ma S (2017) Performance of an F-type floating breakwater: A numerical and experimental study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 231: 583599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090216673461
[9] Elchahal G, Younes R, Lafon P (2008) The effects of reflection coefficient of the harbour sidewall on the performance of floating breakwaters. Ocean Engineering 35: 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.04.015
[10] Gui J, Yuan A, Zhao X, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Guo Y (2025) Numerical analysis of wave dissipation characteristics of bucket-type permeable breakwater. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 1–10
[11] Haskind MD (1957) The exciting forces and wetting of ships in waves. Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR Otdelenie Tekhnicheskikh Nauk 7: 65–79
[12] Ji X, Li Y, Tang Y, Tong B (2019) Viscous damping effect and vortex shedding performance of the novel anti-motion structures on a cylindrical FPSO. Ocean Engineering 190: 106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106430
[13] Kim GJ, Kim SH, Rim UR, Jon MH (2025) Hydrodynamic interaction of a floating structure with free water surface wave near a vertical wall based on a Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) boundary condition. Marine Systems & Ocean Technology 20: 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-024-00159-4
[14] KMSB (2025) Optimising marine logistics in the northwest. https://www.kmsb.com.au/. [Accessed 1 May 2025]
[15] Lavrov A, Guedes Soares C (2016) Modelling the heave oscillations of vertical cylinders with damping plates. International Journal of Maritime Engineering 158: A187–A197. https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v158iA3.988
[16] Li D, Yi C, Fu S, Bai X, Gao W, Lyu B (2025) Motion response characteristics and suppression methods of cylindrical FPSO. China Offshore Oil and Gas 37: 184–193. https://doi.org/10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2025.01.018
[17] Lopez-Pavon C, Souto-Iglesias A (2015) Hydrodynamic coefficients and pressure loads on heave plates for semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbines: A comparative analysis using large scale models. Renewable Energy 81: 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.003
[18] Loukogeorgaki E, Chatjigeorgiou IK (2019) Hydrodynamic performance of an array of truncated cylinders in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering 189: 106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106407
[19] Micallef D, Rezaeiha A (2021) Floating offshore wind turbine aerodynamics: Trends and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 152: 111696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111696
[20] Newman JN (1985) Algorithms for the free-surface Green function. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 19: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055041
[21] Nguyen HP, Wang CM, Tay ZY, Luong VH (2020) Wave energy converter and large floating platform integration: A review. Ocean Engineering 213: 107768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107768
[22] Ning D, Teng B, Song XQ (2005) Analytical study on wave diffraction from a vertical circular cylinder in front of orthogonal vertical walls. Advances in Marine Science 22(1): 29–35
[23] Porter R, Evans DV (2011) Estimation of wall effects on floating cylinders. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 70: 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10665-010-9420-X
[24] Sahoo H, Gayathri R, Khan MBM, Behera H (2023) Hybrid boundary element and eigenfunction expansion method for wave trapping by a floating porous box near a rigid wall. Ships and Offshore Structures 18: 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2022.2108227
[25] Srinivasan N, Chakrabarti S, Radha R (2006) Response analysis of a truss-pontoon semisubmersible with heave-plates. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 128: 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2185679
[26] Sun L, Zong Z, Dong GH (2009) Action of ship waves on a vertical cylinder in front of a vertical wall. In: Zhuang FG, Li JC (eds), New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75995-9_116
[27] Tao L, Cai S (2004) Heave motion suppression of a Spar with a heave plate. Ocean Engineering 31: 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2003.05.005
[28] Teng B, Li Z, Gou Y, Shi H, Li Y (2025) A BEM model for diffraction and radiation problems of a body in front of a partial reflecting wall. Ocean Engineering 324: 120697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120697
[29] Teng B, Ning DZ, Zhang XT (2004) Wave radiation by a uniform cylinder in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering 31: 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(03)00117-3
[30] Wang C, Cui M, Cheng Z, Moan T (2024) A review on design and analysis of floating bridges: Numerical simulations, model tests and field measurements. Ocean Engineering 306: 118065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118065
[31] Wang X, Gu X, Ding J, Wang Q, Cai Z, Cheng X, Guedes Soares C (2025a) Uncertainty analysis of wave loads for multi-connected domain large floating bodies near islands and reefs. Ocean Engineering 335: 121676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121676
[32] Wang ZG, Zhou Y, Zhao XL, Geng J, Guedes Soares C (2025b) Hydrodynamic analysis of a power take-off damped floating breakwater in front of the coast. In: Guedes Soares C, Wang S (eds), Innovations in Renewable Energies Offshore, 1st edn, CRC Press, London, 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003558859-93
[33] Watanabe E, Wang CM, Utsunomiya T, Moan T (2004) Very large floating structures: applications, analysis and design. CORE Report No. 2004–02. Centre for Offshore Research and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
[34] Xin S (2005) Numerical simulation of the motion response of moored ships in front of the wharf. Master thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian
[35] Yuan X, Liu J, Yan J, Guo A (2025) Experimental study on the dynamic responses of a segmental submerged floating tunnel model under the coupled action of waves currents, and earthquakes. Ocean Engineering 339: 122178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122178
[36] Zhang X, Ma S, Duan W (2018) A new L type floating breakwater derived from vortex dissipation simulation. Ocean Engineering 164: 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.059
[37] Zhao X, Du X, Li M, Göteman M (2021) Semi-analytical study on the hydrodynamic performance of an interconnected floating breakwater-WEC system in presence of the seawall. Applied Ocean Research 109: 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102555
[38] Zhao X, Wang J, Geng J, Zhou S, Guedes Soares C (2024) Hydrodynamic investigation of a multi-module floating platform with a wave energy device array. China Ocean Engineering 38: 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-024-0081-3
[39] Zhao X, Xue F, Chen L, Göteman M, Han D, Geng J, Sun S (2023) Hydrodynamic analysis of a floating platform coupled with an array of oscillating bodies. Ocean Engineering 287: 115439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115439
[40] Zheng S, Zhang Y (2015) Wave diffraction from a truncated cylinder in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering 104: 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.065
[41] Zhou Y, Zhao X, Geng J, Guedes Soares C (2024) Wave diffraction and radiation from a floating platform with a moonpool array. ASME 2024 43rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2024), Singapore, V009T13A011. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2024-127652

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2025-5-20。
Foundation item:Supported by the Science and Technology Special Fund of Hainan Province (ZDYF2023GXJS017) and Hainan Province Foreign Experts Project (G20250218009E). This work contributes to the Strategic Research Plan of the Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), which is financed by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Funda??o para a Ciência e Tecnologia-FCT) under contract UIDB/UIDP/00134/2020.
Corresponding author:Xuanlie Zhao,E-mail:xlzhao@hrbeu.edu.cn
Last Update: 2026-06-25