|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Momir Sjeri?,Maja Per?i?,Ivana Jovanovi?,et al.Carbon Footprint and Economic Analysis of LNG-fueled Fishing Vessel Using Real Engine Performance Simulation[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2026,(1):259-276.[doi:10.1007/s11804-025-00640-5]
Click and Copy

Carbon Footprint and Economic Analysis of LNG-fueled Fishing Vessel Using Real Engine Performance Simulation

Info

Title:
Carbon Footprint and Economic Analysis of LNG-fueled Fishing Vessel Using Real Engine Performance Simulation
Author(s):
Momir Sjeri?;  Maja Per?i?;  Ivana Jovanovi?;  Nikola Vladimir
Affilations:
Author(s):
Momir Sjeri?;  Maja Per?i?;  Ivana Jovanovi?;  Nikola Vladimir
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lu?i?a 510000, Zagreb, Croatia
Keywords:
1D/0D simulation; Carbon footprint; Fishing vessels; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost assessment; Liquefied natural gas
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-025-00640-5
Abstract:
Analysis of the environmental and economic performance of fishing vessels has received limited attention compared with other ship types despite their notable contribution to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study evaluates the carbon footprint (CF) and economic viability of a liquefied natural gas (LNG)-fueled fishing vessel, using real engine operation simulations to provide precise and dynamic evaluation of fuel consumption and GHG emissions. Operational profiles are obtained through the utilization of onboard monitoring systems, whereas engine performance is simulated using the 1D/0D AVL BoostTM model. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted to quantify the environmental impact, whereas life cycle cost assessment (LCCA) is performed to analyze the profitability of LNG as an alternative fuel. The potential impact of the future fuel price uncertainties is addressed using Monte Carlo simulations. The LCA findings indicate that LNG has the potential to reduce the CF of the vessel by 14% to 16%, in comparison to a diesel power system configuration that serves as the baseline scenario. The LCCA results further indicate that the total cost of an LNG-powered ship is lower by 9.5%-13.8%, depending on the share of LNG and pilot fuels. This finding highlights the potential of LNG to produce considerable environmental benefits while addressing economic challenges under diverse operational and fuel price conditions.

References:

[1] Ammar NR (2019) An environmental and economic analysis of methanol fuel for a cellular container ship. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 69: 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.001
[2] An?i? I, Per?i? M, Vladimir N (2020) Alternative power options to reduce carbon footprint of ro-ro passenger fleet: A case study of Croatia. J. Clean Prod. 271: 122638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122638
[3] AVL Boost (2013) User guide, “AVL homepage”. Available from https://www.avl.com/simulation [Accessed on Jan. 03, 2025]
[4] Baiju MV, Madhu VR, Dhiju Das PH, Vipin Kumar V, Sajeev N, Nilender K, Upinder K, Veerasamy M (2024) Evaluating LNG-diesel dual-fuel systems in trawling: Results from trials off Cochin, Kerala. Fishery Technology 61: 215-221. https://doi.org/10.56093/ft.v61i3.149805
[5] Basurko OC, Gabi?a G, Quincoces I (2016) Fuel consumption monitoring in fishing vessels and its potential for different stakeholders. Available from https://conferences.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/conferencewebsites/scc2016/1.1.2.pdf [Accessed on Aug. 26, 2023]
[6] Bayraktar M (2023) Investigation of alternative fuelled marine diesel engines and waste heat recovery system utilization on the oil tanker for upcoming regulations and carbon tax. Ocean Engineering 287: 115831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115831
[7] Bellér G, ?rpád I, Kiss JT, Kocsis D (2021) AVL Boost: a powerful tool for research and education. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1935: 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1935/1/012015
[8] Bellot A, Baumler R, Bouallou C, Nemer M, ?lcer A (2024) A cradle-to-grave assessment of carbon and energy footprints of ships using synthetic fuel for net-zeros operations. Ocean Engineering 310: 118392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118392
[9] Bilgili L (2021) Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 144: 110985. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.110985
[10] Blanco-Davis E, Zhou P (2014) LCA as a tool to aid in the selection of retrofitting alternatives. Ocean Engineering 77: 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2013.12.010
[11] Bouman EA, Lindstad E, Rialland AI, Str?mman AH (2017) State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping-A review. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 52: 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
[12] Bui KQ, Perera LP, Emblemsv?g J (2022) Life-cycle cost analysis of an innovative marine dual-fuel engine under uncertainties. J. Clean Prod. 380: 134847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134847
[13] Butarbutar R, Gurning ROS, Semin (2023) Prospect of LNG as marine fuel in Indonesia: An economic review for a case study of 600 TEU container vessel. Applied Sciences 13(5): 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052760
[14] Colantoni A, Villarini M, Monarca D, Carlini M, Mosconi EM, Bocci E, Rajabi Hamedani S (2021) Economic analysis and risk assessment of biomass gasification CHP systems of different sizes through Monte Carlo simulation. Energy Reports 7: 1954-1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.028
[15] DNV (2023) Maritime decarbonization efforts propelled as orders for alternative-fueled vessels grow. Available from https://www.dnv.com/news/maritime-decarbonization-efforts-propelled-as-orders-for-alternative-fueled-vessels-grow-251921/ [Accessed on Jun. 27, 2024]
[16] Duppati G, Younes BZ, Tiwari AK, Hunjra AI (2023) Time-varying effects of fuel prices on stock market returns during COVID-19 outbreak. Resources Policy 81: 103317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103317
[17] European Commission (2024) Reducing emissions from the shipping sector. Available from https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en [Accessed on May 17, 2024]
[18] Eurostat (2024) Natural gas prices-Croatia. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ten00118/default/table?lang=en [Accessed on Jul. 19, 2024]
[19] FAO (2021) Review of the techno-economic performance of the main global fishing fleets. Available from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5ca84ab9-ee4c-46e3-b4dd-764b6dd44f17/content [Accessed on Jan. 4, 2025]
[20] Ghorbani M, Slaets P, Lacey J (2023) A numerical simulation tool for a wind-assisted vessel verified with logged data at sea. Ocean Engineering 290: 116319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116319
[21] GREET (2022) LCA software. Available from https://greet.es.anl.gov/index.php [Accessed on Sep. 27, 2023]
[22] Guo B, Liang Q, Tvete HA, Brinks H, Vanem E (2022) Combined machine learning and physics-based models for estimating fuel consumption of cargo ships. Ocean Engineering 255: 111435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111435
[23] Ha S, Jeong B, Jang H, Park C, Ku B (2023) A framework for determining the life cycle GHG emissions of fossil marine fuels in countries reliant on imported energy through maritime transportation: A case study of South Korea. Science of the Total Environment 897: 165366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165366
[24] Huang J, Fan H, Xu X, Liu Z (2022) Life cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment for using alternative marine fuels: A very large crude carrier (VLCC) case study. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10: 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121969
[25] Hulskotte JHJ, Denier van der Gon HAC (2010) Fuel consumption and associated emissions from seagoing ships at berth derived from an on-board survey. Atmos. Environ. 44: 1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.018
[26] Iannaccone T, Landucci G, Tugnoli A, Salzano E, Cozzani V (2020) Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: Comparison among LNG and diesel technologies. J. Clean Prod. 260: 121069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121069
[27] IMO (2020) Fourth IMO GHG study. Available from https://safety4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/MEPC-75-7-15-Fourth-IMO-GHG-Study-2020-Final-report-Secretariat.pdf [Accessed on Jan. 14, 2024]
[28] IMO (2023) Strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Available from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/2023-IMO-Strategy-on-Reduction-of-GHG-Emissions-from-Ships.aspx [Accessed on Jan. 4, 2025]
[29] International Energy Agency (2023) World energy outlook 2023. Available from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 [Accessed on Jan. 4, 2025]
[30] Jang H, Jeong B, Zhou P, Ha S, Nam D (2021) Demystifying the lifecycle environmental benefits and harms of LNG as marine fuel. Appl. Energy 292: 116869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116869
[31] Jang J, Lim S, Choe SB, Kim JS, Lim HK, Oh J, Oh D (2024) Enhanced predictive modeling vs. LCA simulation: A comparative study on CO2 emissions from ship operations. Ocean Engineering 310: 118506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118506
[32] Jeong S, Woo JH, Oh D (2020) Simulation of greenhouse gas emissions of small ships considering operating conditions for environmental performance evaluation. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 12: 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.07.006
[33] Jovanovi? I, Vladimir N, Per?i? M, Kori?an M (2022) The feasibility of autonomous low-emission ro-ro passenger shipping in the Adriatic Sea. Ocean Engineering 247: 110712. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.110712
[34] Karatug C, Arslanoglu Y, Guedes Soares C (2022) Evaluation of decarbonization strategies for existing ships. In: Trends in Maritime Technology and Engineering Volume 2, CRC Press, London, 45-54
[35] Karatu? ?, Ceylan BO, Ejder E, Arslano?lu Y (2023a) Investigation and examination of LNG, methanol, and ammonia usage on marine vessels. In: Zincir B, Shukla PC, Agarwal AK (Eds.). Decarbonization of Maritime Transport. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Springer, Singapore, 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1677-1_5
[36] Karatu? ?, Ejder E, Tadros M, Arslano?lu Y (2023b) Environmental and economic evaluation of dual-fuel engine investment of a container ship. Journal of Marine Science and Application 22: 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00381-3
[37] Karatu? ?, Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C (2024) Decision support system for ship energy efficiency management based on an optimization model. Energy 292: 130318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130318
[38] Kim JK, Jeong B, Choi JH, Lee WJ (2023) Life cycle assessment of LPG engines for small fishing vessels and the applications of bio LPG fuel in Korea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11: 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081488
[39] Kj?r LL, Pagoropoulos A, Hauschild M, Birkved M, Schmidt JH, McAloone TC (2015) From LCC to LCA using a hybrid Input Output model-a maritime case study. Procedia CIRP 29: 474-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2015.02.004
[40] Korberg AD, Brynolf S, Grahn M, Skov IR (2021) Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 142: 110861. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.110861
[41] Kori?an M, Per?i? M, Vladimir N, Alujevi? N, Fan A (2022) Alternative power options for improvement of the environmental friendliness of fishing trawlers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10: 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121882
[42] Kori?an M, Vladimir N, Fan A (2023) Investigation of the energy efficiency of fishing vessels: Case study of the fishing fleet in the Adriatic Sea. Ocean Engineering 286: 115734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115734
[43] Kumar S, Kwon HT, Choi KH, Lim W, Cho JH, Tak K, Moon I (2011) LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development. Appl Energy 88: 4264-4273
[44] Lee H, Lee J, Roh G, Lee S, Choung C, Kang H (2024) Comparative life cycle assessments and economic analyses of alternative marine fuels: Insights for practical strategies. Sustainability 16: 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052114
[45] Lindstad E, Lagemann B, Rialland A, Gamlem GM, Valland A (2021) Reduction of maritime GHG emissions and the potential role of E-fuels. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 101: 103075. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2021.103075
[46] Liu Y, Ge Y, Tan J, Fu M, Shah AN, Li L, Ji Z, Ding Y (2018) Emission characteristics of offshore fishing ships in the Yellow Bo Sea, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 65: 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.02.020
[47] MAPON (2024) Fleet management & asset tracking platform. Available from https://www.mapon.com/en [Accessed on Jun. 14, 2024]
[48] Ministry of Agriculture of Republic of Croatia (2023) Fishing vessel particulars. Directory of Fisheries. Available from https://ribarstvo.mps.hr/default.aspx?id=13 [Accessed on Aug. 29, 2023]
[49] Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A (2019) Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 22: 67-72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
[50] Per?i? M, An?i? I, Vladimir N (2020a) Life-cycle cost assessments of different power system configurations to reduce the carbon footprint in the Croatian short-sea shipping sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 131: 110028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110028
[51] Per?i? M, Kori?an M, Jovanovi? I, Vladimir N (2023a) Environmental and economic assessment of batteries for marine applications: Case study of all-electric fishing vessels. Batteries 10: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10010007
[52] Per?i? M, Vladimir N, Fan A (2020b) Life-cycle cost assessment of alternative marine fuels to reduce the carbon footprint in short-sea shipping: A case study of Croatia. Appl. Energy 279: 115848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115848
[53] Per?i? M, Vladimir N, Fan A (2021) Techno-economic assessment of alternative marine fuels for inland shipping in Croatia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 148: 111363. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111363
[54] Per?i? M, Vladimir N, Jovanovi? I, Kori?an M (2022) Application of fuel cells with zero-carbon fuels in short-sea shipping. Appl. Energy 309: 118463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2021.118463
[55] Per?i? M, Vladimir N, Kori?an M, Jovanovi? I, Haramina T (2023b) Alternative fuels for the marine sector and their applicability for purse seiners in a life-cycle framework. Applied Sciences 13: 13068. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413068
[56] Qu J, Feng Y, Zhu Y, Wu B, Wu Y, Xiao Z, Zheng S (2023) Assessment of a methanol-fueled integrated hybrid power system of solid oxide fuel cell and low-speed two-stroke engine for maritime application. Appl. Therm. Eng. 230: 120735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120735
[57] Sjeri? M, Tomi? R, Marti? I, Degiuli N, Grlj CG (2024) Environmental and economic aspects of a containership engine performance in off-design conditions. Applied Sciences 14: 4634. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114634
[58] Statista (2024) Diesel price in Croatia. Available from https://www.statista.com/statistics/603784/diesel-fuel-prices-croatia/ [Accessed on Jul. 18, 2024]
[59] Szelangiewicz T, Abramowski T, ?elazny K, Sugalski K (2021) Reduction of resistance, fuel consumption and GHG emission of a small fishing vessel by adding a bulbous bow. Energies 14(7): 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071837
[60] Taghavifar H (2023) Experimental and numerical engine cycle setup for a dual fuel hydrogen, methane, and hythane with diesel to assess the effect of water injection and nozzle geometry. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 42(1): e13936. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13936
[61] Taghavifar H, Mazari F (2022) 1D diesel engine cycle modeling integrated with MOPSO optimization for improved NOx control and pressure boost. Energy 247: 123517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123517
[62] Taghavifar H, Perera LP (2023a) The effect of LNG and diesel fuel emissions of marine engines on GHG-reduction revenue policies under life-cycle costing analysis in shippin. Proceedings of the ASME 2023 42nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 5: Ocean Engineering, Melbourne, Australia, V005T06A035. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2023-104508
[63] Taghavifar H, Perera LP (2023b) Life cycle emission and cost assessment for LNG-retrofitted vessels: the risk and sensitivity analyses under fuel property and load variations. Ocean Engineering 282: 114940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114940
[64] Theotokatos G, Stoumpos S, Bolbot V, Boulougouris E (2020) Simulation-based investigation of a marine dual-fuel engine. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology 19: 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2020.1717266
[65] Tomos BAD, Stamford L, Welfle A, Larkin A (2024) Decarbonising international shipping-A life cycle perspective on alternative fuel options. Energy Convers. Manag. 299: 117848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117848
[66] Tools (2024) Diesel price in Croatia. Available from https://www.tolls.eu/fuel-prices [Accessed on Jul. 18, 2024]
[67] Trading Economics (2024a) Croatia—Natural gas prices: Non-household consumers. Available from https://tradingeconomics.com/croatia/gas-prices-non-household-medium-size-consumers-eurostat-data.html [Accessed on Jul. 19, 2024]
[68] Trading Economics (2024b) EU carbon permits. Available from https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon [Accessed on Jul. 19, 2024]
[69] UNFCCC (2001) Climate change information kit. Available from https://unfccc.int/resource/iuckit/cckit2001en.pdf [Accessed on Jan. 04, 2025]
[70] UNFCCC (2024) The Paris agreement. Available from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement [Accessed on Nov. 3, 2024]
[71] Wang H, Boulougouris E, Theotokatos G, Zhou P, Priftis A, Shi G (2021) Life cycle analysis and cost assessment of a battery powered ferry. Ocean Engineering 241: 110029. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2021.110029
[72] Wang H, Zhou P, Liang Y, Jeong B, Mesbahi A (2020) Optimization of tugboat propulsion system configurations: A holistic life cycle assessment case study. J. Clean Prod. 259: 120903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120903
[73] Wu Y, Guo H, Qi J, Wang S, Zhen L (2024) Ship refueling optimization for dual-fuel ships considering carbon intensity indicator rating limit and uncertain fuel prices. Multimodal Transportation 3: 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2024.100138
[74] Xin R, Zhai J, Liao C, Wang Z, Zhang J, Bazari Z, Ji Y (2022) Simulation study on the performance and emission parameters of a marine diesel engine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10: 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070985
[75] Yan X, He Y, Fan A (2023) Carbon footprint prediction considering the evolution of alternative fuels and cargo: A case study of Yangtze River ships. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 173: 113068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113068
[76] Yao S, Li C, Wei Y (2023) Design and optimization of a zero carbon emission system integrated with the utilization of marine engine waste heat and LNG cold energy for LNG-powered ships. Appl. Therm. Eng. 231: 120976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120976
[77] Zhou C, Tang W, Ding Y, Huang H, Xu H (2024) Analysis of carbon emission reduction paths for ships in the Yangtze River: The perspective of alternative fuels. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12: 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060947
[78] Zincir BA, Arslanoglu Y (2024) Comparative life cycle assessment of alternative marine fuels. Fuel 358: 129995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129995
[79] Zou Q, Yi C, Wang K, Yin X, Zhang Y (2022) Global LNG market: supply-demand and economic analysis. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 983: 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/983/1/012051

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2024-10-16;Accepted date:2024-12-24。<br>Corresponding author:Nikola Vladimir,Email:E-mail:nikola.vladimir@fsb.unizg.hr
Last Update: 2026-03-09