|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Qiang Liu,Yanzun Li,Meng Jing,et al.Application of Feature, Event, and Process Methods to Leakage Scenario Development for Offshore CO2 Geological Storage[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2024,(3):608-616.[doi:10.1007/s11804-024-00441-2]
Click and Copy

Application of Feature, Event, and Process Methods to Leakage Scenario Development for Offshore CO2 Geological Storage

Info

Title:
Application of Feature, Event, and Process Methods to Leakage Scenario Development for Offshore CO2 Geological Storage
Author(s):
Qiang Liu1; 2;  Yanzun Li1; 2;  Meng Jing3; 4;  Qi Li3; 4;  Guizhen Liu3; 4
Affilations:
Author(s):
Qiang Liu1; 2;  Yanzun Li1; 2;  Meng Jing3; 4;  Qi Li3; 4;  Guizhen Liu3; 4
1. State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploitation, Beijing, 100028, China;
2. CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., Beijing, 100028, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Keywords:
Offshore CO2 geological storage|Features;  events;  and processes|Scenario development|Interaction matrix|Risk matrix assessment
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-024-00441-2
Abstract:
Offshore carbon dioxide (CO2) geological storage (OCGS) represents a significant strategy for addressing climate change by curtailing greenhouse gas emissions. Nonetheless, the risk of CO2 leakage poses a substantial concern associated with this technology. This study introduces an innovative approach for establishing OCGS leakage scenarios, involving four pivotal stages, namely, interactive matrix establishment, risk matrix evaluation, cause-effect analysis, and scenario development, which has been implemented in the Pearl River Estuary Basin in China. The initial phase encompassed the establishment of an interaction matrix for OCGS systems based on features, events, and processes. Subsequent risk matrix evaluation and cause-effect analysis identified key system components, specifically CO2 injection and faults/features. Building upon this analysis, two leakage risk scenarios were successfully developed, accompanied by the corresponding mitigation measures. In addition, this study introduces the application of scenario development to risk assessment, including scenario numerical simulation and quantitative assessment. Overall, this research positively contributes to the sustainable development and safe operation of OCGS projects and holds potential for further refinement and broader application to diverse geographical environments and project requirements. This comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the establishment of OCGS leakage scenarios and demonstrates their practical application to risk assessment, laying the foundation for promoting the sustainable development and safe operation of ocean CO2 geological storage projects while proposing possibilities for future improvements and broader applications to different contexts.

References:

AI-Traboulsi M, Sj?gersten S, Colls J, Steven M, Craigon J, Black C (2012) Potential impact of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems on growth and yield in spring field bean. Environmental and Experimental Botany 80: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.007
Arild ?, Ford EP, Lohne HP, Majoumerd MM, Havlova V (2017) A comparison of FEP-analysis and barrier analysis for CO2 leakage risk assessment on an abandoned czech oilfield. Energy Procedia 114: 4237-4255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1564
Bai MX, Song KP, Li Y, Sun JP, Reinicke KM (2015) Development of a novel method to evaluate well integrity during CO2 underground storage. SPE Journal 20(3): 628-641. https://doi.org/10.2118/173000-Pa
Berrouane MT, Lounis Z (2016) Safety assessment of flare systems by fault tree analysis. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy 51(2): 229-234.
Blackford J, Alendal G, Avlesen H, Brereton A, Cazenave PW, Chen B, Dewar M, Holt J, Phelps J (2020) Impact and detectability of hypothetical CCS offshore seep scenarios as an aid to storage assurance and risk assessment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 95: 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102949
Bobbio A, Portinale L, Minichino M, Ciancamerla E (2001) Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71(3): 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00077-6
Bourne S, Crouch S, Smith M (2014) A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification of the Quest CCS Project, Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 26: 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.026
Boyd AD, Liu Y, Stephens JC, Wilson EJ, Pollak M, Peterson TR, Einsiedel E, Meadowcroft J (2013) Controversy in technology innovation: Contrasting media and expert risk perceptions of the alleged leakage at the Weyburn carbon dioxide storage demonstration project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 14: 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.011
Condor J, Asghari K (2009) An alternative theoretical methodology for monitoring the risks of CO2 leakage from wellbores. Energy Procedia 1(1): 2599-2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.026
Dewar M, Saleem U, Flohr A, Schaap A, Strong J, Li J, Roche B, Bull JM, Chen B, Blackford J (2021) Analysis of the physicochemical detectability and impacts of offshore CO2 leakage through multi-scale modelling of in-situ experimental data using the PLUME model. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 110: 103441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103441
Flett M, Brantjes J, Gurton R, McKenna J, Tankersley T, Trupp M (2009) Subsurface development of CO2 disposal for the Gorgon Project. Energy Procedia 1(1): 3031-3038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.081
Hudson JA (1992) Rock engineering systems: theory and practice. Ellis Horwood Ltd., London
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Report No. 92-9169-122-4
Jiang X (2011) A review of physical modelling and numerical simulation of long-term geological storage of CO2. Applied Energy 88(11): 3557-3566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.004
Jiao Y, Hudson JA (1995) The fully-coupled model for rock engineering systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 32(5): 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00038-i
Kanberoglu B, Turan E, K?kkülünk G (2023) Decarbonization of maritime transportation: a case study for Turkish ship fleet. Journal of Marine Science and Application 22: 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-023-00370-6
Kapetaki Z, Hetland J, Le Guenan T, Mikunda T, Scowcroft J (2017) Highlights and lessons from the EU CCS demonstration project network. Energy Procedia 114: 5562-5569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1696
Lackner KS (2003) A guide to CO2 sequestration. Science 300(5626): 1677-1678. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079033.
Li Q, Liu G (2016) Risk assessment of the geological storage of CO2: a review. Geologic Carbon Sequestration: Understanding Reservoir Behavior, 249-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-2709-7_13
Li Q, Liu G, Cai B, Leamon G, Liu LC, Chen Z, Li X (2017) Public awareness of the environmental impact and management of carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage technology: the views of educated people in China. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 19(8): 2041-2056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1387-0
Meissner P, Brands C, Wulf T (2017) Quantifiying blind spots and weak signals in executive judgment: a structured integration of expert judgment into the scenario development process. International Journal of Forecasting 33(1): 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.08.002
Miocic JM, Gilfillan SMV, Roberts JJ, Edlmann K, McDermott CI, Haszeldine RS (2016) Controls on CO2 storage security in natural reservoirs and implications for CO2 storage site selection. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 51: 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.019
Paul JHS (1993) Multiple scenario development: Its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140304
Paulley A, Metcalfe R, Limer L (2011) Systematic FEP and scenario analysis to provide a framework for assessing long-term performance of the Krechba CO2 storage system at In Salah. Energy Procedia 4: 4185-4192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.365
Pruess K (2008) Leakage of CO2 from geologic storage: Role of secondary accumulation at shallow depth. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2(1): 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00095-3
Sandoval N, Reyna JL, Landis AE (2023) Internal consistency and diversity scenario development: a comparative framework to evaluate energy model scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 186: 113632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113632
Son K, Choi K, Yang J, Jeong H, Kim H, Chang K, Heo G (2023) A review of the features, events, and processes and scenario development for Korean risk assessment of a deep geological repository for high-level radioactive waste. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(11): 4083-4095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.07.027
Walke R, Metcalfe R, Limer L, Maul P, Paulley A, Savage D (2011) Experience of the application of a database of generic Features, Events and Processes (FEP) targeted at geological storage of CO2. Energy Procedia 4: 4059-4066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.348
Yamaguchi K, Takizawa K, Shiragaki O, Xue Z, Komaki H, Metcalfe R, Yamaguchi M, Kato H, Ueta S (2013) Features events and processes (FEP) and scenario analysis in the field of CO2 storage. Energy Procedia 37: 4833-4842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.393
Yavuz F, Van Tilburg T, David P, Spruijt M, Wildenborg T (2009) Second generation CO2 FEP analysis: CASSIF - carbon storage scenario identification framework. Energy Procedia 1(1): 2479-2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.010
Zhang L, Zhang S, Jiang W, Wang Z, Li J, Bian Y (2018) A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage. Energy 165: 1178-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.104
Zhang Y, Oldenburg CM, Finsterle S, Jordan P, Zhang K (2009) Probability estimation of CO2 leakage through faults at geologic carbon sequestration sites. Energy Procedia 1(1): 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.008

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2024-1-5;Accepted date:2024-3-3。
Corresponding author:Qi Li,E-mail:qli@whrsm.ac.cn
Last Update: 2024-09-29