|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Jie Cai,Xiaoli Jiang,Yazhou Yang,et al.Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2022,(2):115-132.[doi:10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0]
Click and Copy

Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure

Info

Title:
Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure
Author(s):
Jie Cai1;  Xiaoli Jiang2;  Yazhou Yang3;  Gabriel Lodewijks4;  Minchang Wang5
Affilations:
Author(s):
Jie Cai1;  Xiaoli Jiang2;  Yazhou Yang3;  Gabriel Lodewijks4;  Minchang Wang5
1. Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark;
2. Department of Maritime and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology,2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands;
3. College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies,National University of Defence Technology, Changsha,410073,China;
4. School of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW,2308,Australia
Keywords:
Pipelines|Corrosion|Burst strength|Internal pressure|Data-driven method|Machine learning
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0
Abstract:
A corrosion defect is recognized as one of the most severe phenomena for high-pressure pipelines, especially those served for a long time. Finite-element method and empirical formulas are thereby used for the strength prediction of such pipes with corrosion. However, it is time-consuming for finite-element method and there is a limited application range by using empirical formulas. In order to improve the prediction of strength, this paper investigates the burst pressure of line pipelines with a single corrosion defect subjected to internal pressure based on data-driven methods. Three supervised ML (machine learning) algorithms, including the ANN (artificial neural network), the SVM (support vector machine) and the LR (linear regression), are deployed to train models based on experimental data. Data analysis is first conducted to determine proper pipe features for training. Hyperparameter tuning to control the learning process is then performed to fit the best strength models for corroded pipelines. Among all the proposed data-driven models, the ANN model with three neural layers has the highest training accuracy, but also presents the largest variance. The SVM model provides both high training accuracy and high validation accuracy. The LR model has the best performance in terms of generalization ability. These models can be served as surrogate models by transfer learning with new coming data in future research, facilitating a sustainable and intelligent decision-making of corroded pipelines.

References:

Abbas M, Shafiee M (2020) An overview of maintenance management strategies for corroded steel structures in extreme marine environments. Marine Structures 71:102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102718
Amaya-Gómez R, Sánchez-Silva M, Bastidas-Arteaga E, Schoefs F, Munoz F (2019) Reliability assessments of corroded pipelines based on internal pressure a review. Engineering Failure Analysis 98:190-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.064
Amaya-Gómez R, Sánchez-Silva M, Mu?oz F (2016) Pattern recognition techniques implementation on data from in-line inspection (ili). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 44:735-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.020
ASME B31G, A (1991) Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. ASME B31G-1991
ASME B31G, A (2012) Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines:A Supplement to ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping:an American National Standard. American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Astanin V, Borodachev N, Bogdan S, Kol’tsov V, Savchenko N, Vinogradskii P (2009) Strength of corroded pipelines. Strength of materials 41
Awad M, Khanna R (2015) Support vector regression in efficient learning machines (pp. 67-80). Apress, Berkeley, CA
Benjamin AC, Vieira RD, Freire JLF, de Castro JT (2000) Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion, in:International pipeline conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. p. V002T06A013
Bennett KP, Mangasarian OL (1992) Robust linear programming discrimination of two linearly inseparable sets. Optimization methods and software 1:23-34
Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. springer
Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in:Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pp:144-152
Box GE, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series B (Methodological)26:211-243
Cai J, Chen G, Lützen M, Rytter NGM (2021) A practical ais-based route library for voyage planning at the pre-fixture stage. Ocean Engineering 236, 109478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109478
Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G (2017) Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage-a literature review. Ships and Offshore Structures:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2017.1308214
Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W (2018a) Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with combined dent and metal loss. Marine Structures 61:188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.05.006
Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W (2018b) Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with metal loss. Marine Structures 58:242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.11.011
Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Zhu L (2019) Experimental investigation of residual ultimate strength of damaged metallic pipelines. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 141:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040974
Chauhan V, Crossley J, et al (2009) Corrosion Assessment Guidance for High Strength Steels (Phase 1). Technical Report. GL Industrial Services UK Ltd
Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhang, J, Li X, Zhou J (2015a) Failure analysis of high strength pipeline with single and multiple corrosions. Materials&Design 67:552-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.088
Chen Yf, Zhang J, Zhang H, Liu Xb, Li X, Zhou J, Cao J (2015b) Ultimate load capacity of offshore pipeline with arbitrary shape corrosion defects. China Ocean Engineering 29:241-252
Chin KT, Arumugam T, Karuppanan S, Ovinis M (2020) Failure pressure prediction of pipeline with single corrosion defect using artificial neural network. Pipeline Science and Technology 4:10-17. https://doi.org/10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-1-10-17
Choi J, Goo B, Kim J, Kim Y, Kim W (2003) Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 80:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X
Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20:273-297
Cronin DS, Pick RJ (2000) Experimental database for corroded pipe:evaluation of rstreng and b31g, in:20003rd International Pipeline Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Cronin DS, Roberts KA, Pick RJ (1996) Assessment of long corrosion grooves in line pipe, in:International Pipeline Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. pp:401-408
De Masi G, Gentile M, Vichi R, Bruschi R, Gabetta G (2015) Machine learning approach to corrosion assessment in subsea pipelines, in:OCEANS 2015-Genova, IEEE. pp:1-6
DNV (2017) Recommended practice dnvgl-rp-f101 corroded pipelines
Downey AB (2011) Think stats. "O’Reilly Media, Inc."
Freire J, Vieira R, Castro J, Benjamin A (2006) Part 3:Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Experimental Techniques 30:60-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00109.x
Fukami K, Fukagata K, Taira K (2020) Assessment of supervised machine learning methods for fluid flows. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics:1-23
Ghaboussi J, Sidarta D (1998) New nested adaptive neural networks (nann) for constitutive modeling. Computers and Geotechnics 22:29-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X (97)00034-7
Gholami H, Shahrooi S, Shishesaz M (2020) Predicting the burst pressure of high-strength carbon steel pipe with gouge flaws using artificial neural network. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 11:04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) PS.1949-1204.0000478
Glorot X, Bengio Y (2010) Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in:Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp:249-256
Haghighat E, Raissi M, Moure A, Gomez H, Juanes R (2020) A deep learning framework for solution and discovery in solid mechanics:linear elasticity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02751
Haykin S (2007) Neural networks:a comprehensive foundation. Prentice-Hall, Inc
Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression:Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55-67
Kiefiier J, Vieth P (1990) New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe, oil and gas journal, aug. 6
Kiefner J, Vieth P (1989) Project pr-3-805:A modified criterion for evaluating the remaining strength of corroded pipe. Pipeline Corrosion Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Ling J, Templeton J (2015) Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high reynolds averaged navier stokes uncertainty. Physics of Fluids 27:085103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927765
Liu H, Liu Z, Taylor B, Dong H (2019) Matching pipeline in-line inspection data for corrosion characterization. NDT&E International 101:44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.004
Macdonald K, Cosham A (2005) Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines-gouges and dents. Engineering Failure Analysis 12:720-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.011
Mattioli M, Cherubini P, Baldoni A (2019) New frontiers for pipeline integrity management
Mohd MH, Lee BJ, Cui Y, Paik JK (2015) Residual strength of corroded subsea pipelines subject to combined internal pressure and bending moment. Ships and offshore Structures 10:554-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2015.1037678
Mok D, Pick R, Glover A, Hoff R (1991) Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. International journal of pressure vessels and piping 46:195-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(91)90015-T
Naftaly U, Intrator N, Horn D (1997) Optimal ensemble averaging of neural networks. Network:Computation in Neural Systems 8:283-296
Nair V, Hinton GE (2010) Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines, in:ICML
Ossai CI (2020) Corrosion defect modelling of aged pipelines with a feed-forward multi-layer neural network for leak and burst failure estimation. Engineering Failure Analysis 110:104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104397
Rafiei MH, Adeli H (2017) A novel machine learningbased algorithm to detect damage in high-rise building structures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 26:e1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1400
Rosen J, Potts A, Sincock P, Carra C, Kilner A, Kriznic P, Gumley J,(2016) Novel methods for asset integrity management in a low oil-price environment, in:Offshore Technology Conference, Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/27076-MS
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. nature 323:533-536
Sen D, Aghazadeh A, Mousavi A, Nagarajaiah S, Baraniuk R, Dabak A (2019) Data-driven semi-supervised and supervised learning algorithms for health monitoring of pipes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 131:524-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.003
Smola AJ, Sch?lkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and computing 14:199-222
Specification, A (2004)51, specification for line pipe. Edition March. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB (2007) Using multivariate statistics. volume 5. Pearson Boston, MA
Taylor ME, Stone P (2009) Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains:A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series B (Methodological)58:267-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
Weiss K, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wang D (2016) A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big data 3:1-40
Xie M, Tian Z (2018) A review on pipeline integrity management utilizing in-line inspection data. Engineering Failure Analysis 92:222-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.05.010
Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the royal statistical society:series B (statistical methodology)67:301-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x

Memo

Memo:
Received date: 2021-12-08;Accepted date:2022-04-24。
Corresponding author:Jie Cai,E-mail:jiec@iti.sdu.dk
Last Update: 2022-08-17