Benek J, Steger J, Dougherty FC (1983) A flexible grid embedding technique with application to the Euler equations. 6th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Danvers
Carlton J (2018) Marine propellers and propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann
Durante D, Dubbioso G, Testa C (2013) Simplified hydrodynamic models for the analysis of marine propellers in a wake-field. Journal of Hydrodynamics 25(6):954-965
Gaggero S, Dubbioso G, Villa D, Muscari R, Viviani M (2019) Propeller modeling approaches for off-design operative conditions. Ocean Engineering 178:283-305
Gaggero S, Villa D, Viviani M (2014) An investigation on the discrepancies between RANSE and BEM approaches for the prediction of marine propeller unsteady performances in strongly non-homogeneous wakes. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Gaggero S, Villa D, Viviani M (2017) An extensive analysis of numerical ship self-propulsion prediction via a coupled BEM/RANS approach. Applied Ocean Research 66:55-78
Gaskell P, Lau A (1988) Curvature-compensated convective transport:SMART, a new boundedness-preserving transport algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 8(6):617-641
Greve M, W?ckner-Kluwe K, Abdel-Maksoud M, Rung T (2012) Viscous-inviscid coupling methods for advanced marine propeller applications. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012:743060
Henshaw WD, Schwendeman DW (2006) Moving overlapping grids with adaptive mesh refinement for high-speed reactive and non-reactive flow Journal of Computational Physics 216(2):744-779
Hess J, Smith A (1962) Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three dimensional bodies. J ship Res 8(4):22-44
Hess JL (1972) Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies:Douglas Aircraft Co Long Beach CA
Hess JL, Valarezo WO (1985) Calculation of steady flow about propellers using a surface panel method. Journal of Propulsion and Power 1(6):470-476
ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines (2011) Performance Prediction Method 7.5-02-03-01.4:9
Jasak H (1996) Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. PhD thesis, University of London, London
Katz J, Plotkin A (2001) Low-speed aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press
Kim D, Choi H (2000) A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics 162(2):411-428
Leonard B (1991) The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 88(1):17-74
Meakin R, Suhs N (1989) Unsteady aerodynamic simulation of multiple bodies in relative motion. 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
Najafi S, Abbaspoor M (2019) Numerical investigation of flow pattern and hydrodynamic forces of submerged marine propellers using unsteady boundary element method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M:Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 233(1):67-79
Najafi S, Abbaspour M (2017) Numerical study of propulsion performance in swimming fish using boundary element method. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 39(2):443-455
Panahi R, Jahanbakhsh E, Seif MS (2006) Development of a VoF-fractional step solver for floating body motion simulation. Applied Ocean Research 28(3):171-181
Panahi R, Jahanbakhsh E, Seif MS (2009) Towards simulation of 3D nonlinear high-speed vessels motion. Ocean Engineering 36(3-4):256-265
Politis G (2016) Unsteady wake rollup modeling using a mollifier based filtering technique. Dev. Appl. Ocean. Eng 5(1):1-28
Politis GK (2004) Simulation of unsteady motion of a propeller in a fluid including free wake modeling. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 28(6):633-653
Politis GK (2005) Unsteady rollup modeling for wake-adapted propellers using a time-stepping method. Journal of Ship Research 49(3):216-231
Politis GK (2011) Application of a BEM time stepping algorithm in understanding complex unsteady propulsion hydrodynamic phenomena. Ocean Engineering 38(4):699-711
Pourmostafa M, Ghadimi P (2020a) Applying boundary element method to simulate a high-skew Controllable Pitch Propeller with different hub diameters for preliminary design purposes. Cogent Engineering 7(1):1805857
Pourmostafa M, Ghadimi P (2020b) Unsteady 2D and 3D Navier-Stokes Solver with application of multigrid scheme to pressure poisson fractional step on arbitrary unstructured grids in various applications with emphasis on ship motion. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020:1-28
Queutey P, Deng GB, Guilmineau E, Salvatore F (2013) A comparison between full RANSE and coupled RANSE-BEM approaches in ship propulsion performance prediction. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2013-10366
Rao, ZQ, Yang CJ (2017) Numerical prediction of effective wake field for a submarine based on a hybrid approach and an RBF interpolation. Journal of Hydrodynamics 29(4):691-701
Rijpkema D, Starke B, Bosschers J (2013) Numerical simulation of propeller-hull interaction and determination of the effective wake field using a hybrid RANS-BEM approach. 3rd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Launceston, Australia
RV50 Test Report (2011) Hydrodynamic model tests. Test Report No. 2512/01, Model No.2512, Vienna Model Basin (www.sva.at):43
Ubbink O, Issa R (1999) A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes. Journal of Computational Physics 153(1):26-50
Wang Y, Abdel-Maksoud M, Song B (2016) Convergence of different wake alignment methods in a panel code for steady-state flows. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 21(4):567-578
Zhu Q, Wolfgang M, Yue D, Triantafyllou M (2002) Three-dimensional flow structures and vorticity control in fish-like swimming. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 468:1-28