|Table of Contents|

Citation:
　Stefano Gaggero,Diego Villa.Cavitating Propeller Performance in Inclined Shaft Conditions with OpenFOAM: PPTC 2015 Test Case[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2018,(1):1-20.[doi:10.1007/s11804-018-0008-6]
Click and Copy

Cavitating Propeller Performance in Inclined Shaft Conditions with OpenFOAM: PPTC 2015 Test Case

Info

Title:
Cavitating Propeller Performance in Inclined Shaft Conditions with OpenFOAM: PPTC 2015 Test Case
Author(s):
Stefano Gaggero;  Diego Villa
Affilations:
Author(s):
Stefano Gaggero;  Diego Villa
Department of Electric, Electronic, Telecommunications Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy
Keywords:
Propeller; Cavitation; OpenFOAM; RANSE; BEM; Unsteady flow; PPTC; Inclined shaft
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.1007/s11804-018-0008-6
Abstract:
In this paper, we present our analysis of the non-cavitating and cavitating unsteady performances of the Potsdam Propeller Test Case (PPTC) in oblique flow. For our calculations, we used the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equation (RANSE) solver from the open-source OpenFOAM libraries. We selected the homogeneous mixture approach to solve for multiphase flow with phase change, using the volume of fluid (VoF) approach to solve the multiphase flow and modeling the mass transfer between vapor and water with the Schnerr-Sauer model. Comparing the model results with the experimental measurements collected during the Second Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance-SMP’15 enabled our assessment of the reliability of the open-source calculations. Comparisons with the numerical data collected during the workshop enabled further analysis of the reliability of different flow solvers from which we produced an overview of recommended guidelines (mesh arrangements and solver setups) for accurate numerical prediction even in off-design conditions. Lastly, we propose a number of calculations using the boundary element method developed at the University of Genoa for assessing the reliability of this dated but still widely adopted approach for design and optimization in the preliminary stages of very demanding test cases.

References:

Aktas B, Atlar M, Turkmen S, Korkut E, Fitzsimmons P (2016a)Systematic cavitation tunnel tests of a propeller in uniform and inclined flow conditions as part of a round robin test campaign. Ocean Eng 120:136-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.015
Aktas B, Atlar M, Turkmen S, Shi W, Sampson R, Korkut E, Fitzsimmons P (2016b) Propeller cavitation noise investigations of a research vessel using medium size cavitation tunnel tests and fullscale trials. Ocean Eng 120:122-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.040
Asnaghi A, Feymark A, Bensow RE (2015) Computational analysis of cavitating marine propeller performance using OpenFOAM.Proceedings of Second Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2015, Austin, Texas, USA, 4 June
Bensow RE, Bark G (2010a) Implicit LES predictions of the cavitating flow on a propeller. J Fluids Eng 132(4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001342
Bensow, R E, Bark G (2010b) Simulating cavitating flows with LES in OpenFOAM. Proceedings of the V European conference on computational fluid dynamics ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, Portugal
Bertetta D, Brizzolara S, Canepa E, Gaggero S, Viviani M (2012a) EFD and CFD characterization of a CLT propeller. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012:348939-348922. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/348939
Bertetta D, Brizzolara S, Gaggero S, Savio L, Viviani M (2012b) CPP propeller cavitation and noise optimization at different pitches with panel code and validation by cavitation tunnel measurements. Ocean Eng 53:177-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.026
CD-Adapco (2014) StarCCM+ ver. 9.04.009 users guide. Available from http://www.cd-adapco.com/
Coutier-Delgosha O, Fortes-Patella R, Reboud JL (2003) Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation. Journal of Fluid Engineering 125:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1524584
Dubbioso G, Muscari R, Di Mascio A (2013) Analysis of the performance of a marine propeller operating in oblique flow. Comput Fluids 75:86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.01.017
Dubbioso G, Muscari R, Di Mascio A (2014) Analysis of the performance of a marine propeller operating in oblique flow. Part 2:very high incidence angles. Comput Fluids 92:56-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.11.032
El Moctar O, Bertram V (2000) RANS simulation of propeller in oblique flow. Proceedings of the 3rd Numerical Towing Tank Symposium, Tjarno, Sveeden, pp. 46-38
Farrell PE, Maddison JR (2011) Conservative interpolation between volume meshes by local Galerkin projection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(1):89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.015
Fine NE, Kinnas SA (1993) A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two-and three-dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils. J Fluid Mech 254(1):151-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093002071
Franc JP, Michel JM (2004) Fundamentals of cavitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Gaggero S, Villa D (2016) Steady cavitating propeller performance by using OpenFOAM, StarCCM+ and a boundary element method.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M:Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 231:411-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090216644280
Gaggero S, Villa D, Brizzolara S (2010) RANS and panel method for unsteady propeller analysis. J Hydrodyn 22(5):564-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60253-5
Gaggero S, Rizzo CM, Tani G, Viviani M (2012) EFD and CFD design and analysis of a propeller in decelerating duct. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012:823831-823815. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/823831
Gaggero S, Tani G, Viviani M, Conti F (2014a) A study on the numerical prediction of propellers cavitating tip vortex. Ocean Eng 92:137-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.09.042
Gaggero S, Villa D, Viviani M (2014b) An investigation on the discrepancies between RANS and BEM approaches for the prediction of marine propeller unsteady performance in strongly nonhomogeneous wakes. Proceedings of ASME, 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, OMAE 2014, San Francisco, CA, USA, 8-13 June. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23831
Gaggero S, Gonzalez-Adalid J, Perez SM (2016a) Design and analysis of a new generation of CLT propellers. Appl Ocean Res 59:424-450.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.06.014
Gaggero S, Gonzalez-Adalid J, Perez Sobrino M (2016b) Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms. Appl Ocean Res 55:102-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2015.12.004
Heinke HJ, Lubke L (2011) The SMP 2011 workshop on cavitation and propeller performance-case 2, propeller open water performance and cavitation behavior. Proceedings of First Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2011, Hamburg, 17-18 June
Hoshino T (1998) Experimental data for unsteady panel calculations and comparisons (SEIUN-MARU HSP). In:Gindroz, B (eds). 22nd ITTC Propulsion Committee, Proceedings of the Propeller RANS/Panel Method Workshop Proceedings
Hsin CY (1990) Development and analysis of panel methods for propellers in unsteady flow. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, Cambridge, p 15-20
Kinnas SA, Abdel-Maksoud M, Barkmann U, Lubke L, Tian Y (2015)The Second Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance.Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2015, Austin, TX, USA, 31 May-4 June
Krasilnikov V, Zhang ZR, Hong FW (2009) Analysis of unsteady propeller blade forces by RANS. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2009, Trondheim, Sweeden
Kuiper G (1981) Cavitation inception on ship propeller models. Ph.D.thesis, Netherlands Ship Model Basin, Wageningen
Kunz RF, Boger DA, Stinebring DR, Chyczewski JW, Gibeling HJ, Venkateswaran S, Govindan TR (2000) A preconditioned NavierStokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Computer & Fluids 29(8):849-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00039-0
Li DQ (2011) Prediction of non-cavitating and cavitating performance of a SVA Potsdam propeller. Proceedings of First Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2011, Hamburg, Germany17-18 June
Li DQ (2015) Prediction of pressure pulses and cavitation behavior of PPTC propeller in oblique flow with a 12 shaft inclination.Proceedings of Second Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2015, Austin, Texas, USA
Lu NX, Bensow RE, Bark G (2014) Large eddy simulation of cavitation development on highly skewed propellers. J Mar Sci Technol 19:197-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0240-3
Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):598-1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
Merkle CL, Feng J, Buelow PEO (1998) Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France
Morgut M, Nobile E (2011) Numerical predictions of the cavitating and non-cavitating flow around the model scale propeller PPTC.Proceedings of First Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2011, Hamburg, 17-18 June
Morgut M, Nobile E (2012a) Numerical predictions of cavitating flow around model scale propellers by CFD and advanced model calibration. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012:618180-618111. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/618180
Morgut M, Nobile E (2012b) Influence of grid type and turbulence model on the numerical prediction of the flow around marine propellers working in uniform inflow. Ocean Eng 42:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.012
Morino L, Kuo CC (1974) Subsonic potential aerodynamic for complex configuration:a general theory. AIAA J 12:191-197. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49191
OpenFOAM Foundation (2016) OpenFOAM 4.1 users guide. Available from http://www.openfoam.org/
Rusche H (2002) Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London
Salvatore, F., Streckwall, H. and van Terwisga, T. (2009) Propeller Cavitation Modelling by CFD-Results from the VIRTUE 2008 Rome Workshop. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2009, Trondheim, Norway
Sauer J, Schnerr G (2000) Unsteady cavitating flows-a new cavitation model based on a modified front capturing method and bubble dynamics. Proceedings of the 2000 ASME fluid engineering summer conference, Boston, MA, 11-15 June
Sipila T, Siikonen T, Saisto I (2011) FINFLO RANS-predictions for propeller performance. Proceedings of First Workshop on Cavitation and Propeller Performance, the Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2011, Hamburg, Germany, 17-18 June
SVA Potsdam (2015) Potsdam Propeller Test Case PPTC. Available from http://www.sva-potsdam.de/en/potsdam-propeller-test-case-pptc/
Vaz G, Bosschers G (2006) Modelling three dimensional sheet cavitation on marine propellers using a boundary element method. Proceedings of the international 6th symposium on cavitation, CAV2006, Wageningen, Netherlands, 11-15 September
Vaz G, Hally D, Huuva T, Bulten N, Muller P, Becchi P, Herrer JLR, Whitworth S Macè R, Korsstrom (2015) Cavitating flow calculations for the E779A propeller in open water and behind conditions:code comparison and solution validation. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP 2015, Austin, USA; TX, 31 May-4 June

Memo

Memo:
Received date:2016-09-15;Accepted date:2017-05-22。
Corresponding author:Stefano Gaggero, stefano.gaggero@unige.it
Last Update: 2018-10-11