Citation:
Chao Wang,Chunyu Guo,Xin Chang,et al.Analysis of Cavitation Performance of a 2-D Hydrofoil Based on Mixed-iterative Method[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2013,(1):52-57.[doi:10.1007/s11804-013-1168-7]
Click and Copy
Analysis of Cavitation Performance of a 2-D Hydrofoil Based on Mixed-iterative Method
Chao Wang,Chunyu Guo,Xin Chang,et al.Analysis of Cavitation Performance of a 2-D Hydrofoil Based on Mixed-iterative Method[J].Journal of Marine Science and Application,2013,(1):52-57.[doi:10.1007/s11804-013-1168-7]
Info
- Title:
- Analysis of Cavitation Performance of a 2-D Hydrofoil Based on Mixed-iterative Method
- Author(s):
- Chao Wang; Chunyu Guo; Xin Chang; Sheng Huang and Pusun Cao
- Affilations:
- Keywords:
- 2-D hydrofoil; cavitation performance; nonlinear theory; mixed-iterative method; cavity shape for fixed cavitation number (CSCN); cavity shape for fixed cavity length (CSCL)
- DOI:
- 10.1007/s11804-013-1168-7
- Abstract:
- In order to study cavitation characteristics of a 2-D hydrofoil, the method that combines nonlinear cavitation model and mixed-iteration is used to predict and analyze the cavitation performance of hydrofoils. The cavitation elements are nonlinearly disposed based on the Green formula and perturbation potential panel method. At the same time, the method that combines cavity shape for fixed cavity length (CSCL) iteration and cavity shape for fixed cavitation number (CSCN) iteration is used to work out the thickness and length of hydrofoil cavitations. Through analysis of calculation results, it can be concluded that the jump of pressure and velocity potentially exist between cavitation end area and non-cavitations area on suction surface when cavitation occurs on hydrofoil. In certain angles of attack, the cavitation number has a negative impact on the length of cavitations. And under the same angle of attack and cavitation number, the bigger the thickness of the hydrofoil, the shorter the cavitations length.
References:
Bensow RE, Bark G (2010). Implicit LES predictions of the cavitating flow on a propeller. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 132(4), 041302.
Brewer W, Kinnas S (1996). Experiment and viscous flow analysis on a partially cavitating hydrofoil. Journal of Ship Research, 41(3), 161-171.
Chen Ying, Lu Chuanjing, Guo Jianhong (2011). Numerical simulation and mechanism analysis on the periodic cavitating flow around hydrofoil. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 28(1), 1-6.
Dittakavi N, Chunekar A, Frankel S (2010). Large eddy simulation of turbulent-cavitation interactions in a Venturi nozzle. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 132(12), 121301.
Dular M, Bachert R, Stoffel B, ?irok B (2005). Experimental evaluation of numerical simulation of cavitating flow around hydrofoil. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 24(4), 522-538.
Han Baoyu, Xiong Ying, Chen Shuangqiao (2009). Numerical simulation of cavitation around two-dimensional hydrofoil. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 24(6), 740-746.
He Miao, Huang Sheng, Wang Chao, Chang Xin (2010). Numerical computation of cavitating flow around 2-D hydrofoil. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 9(1), 63-68.
Huang Biao, Wang Guoyu, Zhang Bo (2011). Assessment of cavitation models for computation of unsteady cavitating flows. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 15(11), 1195-1202.
Ji Bin, Hong Fanwen, Peng Xiaoxing (2008). The numerical analysis of shedding characteristics on partial cavitation over 2D hydrofoil. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 23(4), 412-418.
Kinnas SA (1991). Leading edge correction to the linear theory of cavitating hydrofoils. Journal of Ship Research, 35(1), 15-27.
Kinnas SA, Fine NE (1993). A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two- and three dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 254, 151-181.
Kinnas SA, Mishima S, Brewer WH (2004). Nonlinear analysis of viscous flow around cavitating hydrofoils. Proceedings Twentieth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Santa Barbara, USA, 446-465.
Knapp RT, Daily JW, Haminitt FG (1981). Cavitation. Water Conservancy Press, Beijing, China.
Li Ziru, Pourquie M, Van Terwisga TJC (2010). A numerical study of steady and unsteady cavitation on a 2d hydrofoil. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(5), 770-777.
Padmanabhan K (2000). Flow modeling for partially cavitating hydrofoils. PhD thesis, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 15-20.
Parkin BR (1959). Linearized theory of cavity flow in two-dimensions. The RAND Corporation Santa Monica, California, United States, Report No. TR R-1745.
Singhal AK, Athavale MM, Li Huiying, Jiang Yu (2002). Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(3), 617-624.
Tulin MP (1953). Steady two-dimensional cavity flows about slender bodies. DTMB, Report No. TR R-834.
Tulin MP (1964). Super-cavitating flows-small perturbation theory. Journal of Ship Research, 7(3), 16-37.
Uhlman JS (1989). The surface singularity or boundary integral method applied to super-cavitating hydrofoils. Journal of Ship Research, 33(1), 16-20.
Wang Chao, Chang Xin, Huang Sheng, He Miao (2010). Impact factors of numerical computation about cavitating flow. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 32(19), 80-84.
Wu YT (1956). A note on the linear and nonlinear theories for fully cavitated hydrofoils. Calif. Inst of Tech. United States, Hydrodynamics Lab Report No. 1, 21-22.
Memo
- Memo:
- Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41176074), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2012M512133), and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No.20102304120026).
